Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 10:12:738608.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.738608. eCollection 2021.

Interactive Regulation of Hormone and Resistance Gene in Proline Metabolism Is Involved in Effector-Triggered Immunity or Disease Susceptibility in the Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris- Brassica napus Pathosystem

Affiliations

Interactive Regulation of Hormone and Resistance Gene in Proline Metabolism Is Involved in Effector-Triggered Immunity or Disease Susceptibility in the Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris- Brassica napus Pathosystem

Md Al Mamun et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

To characterize cultivar variations in hormonal regulation of the transition between pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity or susceptibility (ETI or ETS), the responses of resistance (R-) genes, hydrogen peroxide, and proline metabolism in two Brassica napus cultivars to contrasting disease susceptibility (resistant cv. Capitol vs. susceptible cv. Mosa) were interpreted as being linked to those of endogenous hormonal levels and signaling genes based on a time course of disease symptom development. Disease symptoms caused by the Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) infections were much more developed in cv. Mosa than in cv. Capitol, as shown by an earlier appearance (at 3 days postinoculation [3 DPI]) and larger V-shaped necrosis lesions (at 9-15 DPI) in cv. Mosa. The cultivar variations in the R-genes, hormone status, and proline metabolism were found in two different phases (early [0-3 DPI] and later [9-15 DPI]). In the early phase, Xcc significantly upregulated PTI-related cytoplasmic kinase (Botrytis-induced kinase-1 [BIK1]) expression (+6.3-fold) with salicylic acid (SA) accumulation in cv. Capitol, while relatively less (+2.6-fold) with highly increased jasmonic acid (JA) level in cv. Mosa. The Xcc-responsive proline accumulation in both cultivars was similar to upregulated expression of proline synthesis-related genes (P5CS2 and P5CR). During the later phase in cv. Capitol, Xcc-responsive upregulation of ZAR1 (a coiled-coil-nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat [CC-NB-LRR-type R-gene]) was concomitant with a gradual increase in JA levels without additional proline accumulation. However, in cv. Mosa, upregulation of TAO1 (a toll/interleukin-1 receptor-nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat [TIR-NB-LRR-type R-gene]) was consistent with an increase in SA and abscisic acid (ABA) levels and resulted in an antagonistic depression of JA, which led to a proline accumulation. These results indicate that Xcc-induced BIK1- and ZAR1-mediated JA signaling interactions provide resistance and confirm ETI, whereas BIK1- and TAO1-enhanced SA- and/or ABA-mediated proline accumulation is associated with disease susceptibility (ETS).

Keywords: Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris; effector-triggered immunity; pattern-triggered immunity; phytohormone; proline metabolism; resistance gene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visible disease symptom development (A,B) and H2O2 concentration (C,D) in the non-Xcc-inoculated (gray bar) and Xcc-inoculated leaves (black and red bars for cv. Capitol and cv. Mosa, respectively) of two Brassica napus cultivars. The vertical bars indicate mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant difference levels between non-Xcc- and Xcc-inoculated plants are denoted by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative gene expression of Botrytis-induced kinase 1 [BIK1; (A,B)], Hop (Hrp-dependent outer protein) Z-activated resistance 1 [ZAR1; (C,D)], and target of AvrB operation 1 [TAO1, (E,F)] in the non-Xcc-inoculated (gray bar) and Xcc-inoculated leaves (black and red bars for cv. Capitol and cv. Mosa, respectively) of two Brassica napus cultivars. The vertical bars indicate mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant levels (between non-inoculated and Xcc-inoculated plants) are denoted by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The endogenous level of salicylic acid (A,B), jasmonic acid (C,D), abscisic acid (E,F), and the SA/JA (G,H) ratio in two Brassica napus cultivars with non-Xcc-inoculated (gray bar) and Xcc-inoculated leaves (black and red bars for cv. Capitol and cv. Mosa, respectively). The vertical bars indicate mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant difference levels between non-inoculated and Xcc-inoculated plants are denoted by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative gene expression of hormonal signaling genes. Isochorismate synthase 1 [ICS1; (A,B)], pathogenesis-related protein 1 [PR1; (C,D)], 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase [NCED3; (E,F)], jasmonate insensitive 1 [MYC2; (G,H)], lipoxygenase 2 [LOX2; (I,J)], and plant defensing factor 1.2 [PDF1.2; (K,L)] in the non-Xcc-inoculated (gray bar) and Xcc-inoculated leaves (black and red bars for cv. Capitol and cv. Mosa, respectively) of two Brassica napus cultivars. The vertical bars indicate mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant levels (between non-inoculated and Xcc-inoculated plants) are denoted by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Endogenous pyrroline-5-carboxylate (A,B) and proline level [P5C; (C,D)] in the non-Xcc-inoculated (gray bar) and Xcc-inoculated leaves (black and red bars for cv. Capitol and cv. Mosa, respectively) of two Brassica napus cultivars. The vertical bars indicate mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant levels (between non-inoculated and Xcc-inoculated plants) are denoted by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Relative gene expression of proline metabolism-related genes. Relative gene expression of proline metabolism-related genes, pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase 2 [P5CS2; (A,B)], pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase [P5CR; (C,D)], and proline dehydrogenase [PDH; (E,F)] in the non-Xcc-inoculated (gray bar) and Xcc-inoculated leaves (black and red bar for cv. Capitol and cv. Mosa, respectively) of two Brassica napus cultivars. The vertical bars indicate mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant levels (between non-inoculated and Xcc-inoculated plants) are denoted by **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Outline of effector-triggered immunity (ETI) and effector-triggered susceptibility (ETS) in Xcc-inoculated plants of two Brassica napus cultivars. (A) ETI in cv. Capitol and (B) ETS in cv. Mosa. The impact of the treatment on the measurement is expressed by the thickness of the arrows.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson J. P., Badruzsaufari E., Schenk P. M., Manners J. M., Desmond O. J., Ehlert C., et al. . (2004). Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate-ethylene signaling pathways modulates defense gene expression and disease resistance in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 16, 3460–3479. 10.1105/tpc.104.025833 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ayoubi N., Soleimani M. J. (2014). Possible effects of pathogen inoculation and salicylic acid pre-treatment on the biochemical changes and proline accumulation in green bean. Arch. Phytopathol. Pflanzenschutz. 48, 212–222. 10.1080/03235408.2014.884826 - DOI
    1. Bigeard J., Colcombet J., Hirt H. (2015). Signaling mechanisms in pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). Mol. Plant. 8, 521–539. 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caarls L., Pieterse C. M. J., Wees S. C. M. V. (2015). How salicylic acid takes transcriptional control over jasmonic acid signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 6:170. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00170 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cecchini N. M., Monteoliva M. I., Alvarez M. E. (2011). Proline dehydrogenase contributes to pathogen defense in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 155, 1947–1959. 10.1104/pp.110.167163 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources