Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0263089.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263089. eCollection 2022.

Resilience profiles across context: A latent profile analysis in a German, Greek, and Swiss sample of adolescents

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Resilience profiles across context: A latent profile analysis in a German, Greek, and Swiss sample of adolescents

Clarissa Janousch et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The present study investigated resilience profiles (based on levels of symptoms of anxiety and depression and five dimensions of protective factors) of 1,160 students from Germany (n = 346, 46.0% females, Mage = 12.77, SDage = 0.78), Greece (n = 439, 54.5% females, Mage = 12.68, SDage = 0.69), and Switzerland (n = 375, 44.5% females, Mage = 12.29, SDage = 0.88) using latent profile analyses. We also checked for measurement invariance and investigated the influence of gender and migration on class membership. A three-profile-solution was found for Switzerland (nonresilient 22.1%, moderately resilient 42.9%, untroubled 34.9%), and a four-profile-solution was the best fitting model for Germany (nonresilient 15.7%, moderately resilient 44.2%, untroubled 27.3%, resilient 12.7%) and Greece (nonresilient 21.0%, moderately resilient 30.8%, untroubled 24.9%, resilient 23.3%). Measurement invariance did not hold across the three countries. Profile differences regarding class membership predictions were detected for Germany and Greece, but none for Switzerland. Results implicate that resilience profiles are highly contextually sensitive, and resilience research findings should not be generalized considering the particularity of contexts, people, and outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Latent profiles of Switzerland.
Note. Anx = anxiety; Dep = depression; PC = personal competence; SC = social competence; SS = structured style; SR = social resources; FC = family cohesion.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Latent profiles of Germany.
Note. Anx = anxiety; Dep = depression; PC = personal competence; SC = social competence; SS = structured style; SR = social resources; FC = family cohesion.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Latent profiles of Greece.
Note. Anx = anxiety; Dep = depression; PC = personal competence; SC = social competence; SS = structured style; SR = social resources; FC = family cohesion.

References

    1. Ungar M, editor. Multisystemic resilience: adaptation and transformation in contexts of change. New York: Oxford University Press; 2021.
    1. Quinlan AE, Berbés-Blázquez M, Haider LJ, Peterson GD. Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. Allen C, editor. J Appl Ecol. 2016. Jun;53(3):677–87.
    1. Culture Panter-Brick C. and Resilience: Next Steps for Theory and Practice. In: Theron LC, Liebenberg L, Ungar M, editors. Youth Resilience and Culture [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2015. [cited 2021 Dec 10]. p. 233–44. (Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology; vol. 11). Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-017-9415-2_17 - DOI
    1. Ungar M, Theron L. Resilience and mental health: how multisystemic processes contribute to positive outcomes. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. May;7(5):441–8. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30434-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dumont M, Provost MA. Resilience in Adolescents: Protective Role of Social Support, Coping Strategies, Self-Esteem, and Social Activities on Experience of Stress and Depression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1999. Jun;28(3):343–63.

Publication types

MeSH terms