Angiogenic factors as prognostic markers in neuroendocrine neoplasms
- PMID: 35088292
- DOI: 10.1007/s12020-021-02942-4
Angiogenic factors as prognostic markers in neuroendocrine neoplasms
Abstract
Purpose: Angiogenic markers in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have recently received increasing attention, but their clinical role remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of angiogenic markers in NEN aggressiveness and prognosis.
Methods: We performed a prospective observational study including 46 consecutive patients with proven NENs of pulmonary (45.65%) and gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) (54.35%) origin and 29 healthy controls. Circulating pro-angiogenic factors were measured by ELISA assay. ANG2 tissue expression was evaluated in a subgroup of ten patients by immunohistochemistry.
Results: The study demonstrated a significantly higher level of ANG2, ANG1, sTIE2, and PROK2 in patients affected by NENs compared to controls. In the NENs' group we measured that: (i) ANG2 levels were higher in poorly vs well-differentiated NENs: 4.85 (2.75-7.42) vs 3.16 (1.66-6.36) ng/ml, p = 0.046 and in tumor stage 3-4 compared to stage 1-2: 4.24 (2.66-8.72) vs 2.73 (1.53-5.70), p = 0.044; (ii) ANG2 and PROK2 were significantly higher in patents with progressive disease compared to stable disease: ANG2 = 6.26 (3.98-10.99) vs 2.73 (1.65-4.36) pg/ml, p = 0.001; PROK2 = 29.19 (28.42-32.25) vs 28.37 (28.14-28.91) pg/ml, p = 0.035. Immunohistochemistry confirmed ANG2 expression in tumor specimens.
Conclusions: We documented higher levels of angiogenic markers in NENs, with an association between ANG2 serum levels and NENs morphology and staging. In both GEP and lung NENs, ANG2 and PROK2 are higher in case of tumor progression, suggesting a potential role as prognostic markers in NENs patients.
Keywords: Angiogenesis; Angiopoietin; Neuroendocrine neoplasm; Neuroendocrine tumor; PROK2; Prognostic marker.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- J. Hallet, C.H. Law, M. Cukier, R. Saskin, N. Liu, S. Singh, Exploring the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, metastatic presentation, and outcomes. Cancer 121(4), 589–597 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29099 - DOI - PubMed
-
- A. Dasari, C. Shen, D. Halperin, B. Zhao, S. Zhou, Y. Xu et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 3(10), 1335–1342 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- K.I. Alexandraki, M. Tsoli, G. Kyriakopoulos, A. Angelousi, G. Nikolopoulos, D. Kolomodi et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine neoplasms of unknown primary origin. Minerva Endocrinol. 44(4), 378–386 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23736/S0391-1977.19.03012-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- G. Gaudenzi, A. Dicitore, S. Carra, D. Saronni, C. Pozza, E. Giannetta et al. MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: precision medicine in neuroendocrine neoplasms: an update on current management and future perspectives. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 181(1), R1–R10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-19-0021 - DOI - PubMed
-
- A. Couvelard, D. O’Toole, H. Turley, R. Leek, A. Sauvanet, C. Degott et al. Microvascular density and hypoxia-inducible factor pathway in pancreatic endocrine tumours: negative correlation of microvascular density and VEGF expression with tumour progression. Br. J. Cancer 92(1), 94–101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602245 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous