Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 22;7(1):e0124021.
doi: 10.1128/msystems.01240-21. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

Twenty Important Research Questions in Microbial Exposure and Social Equity

Affiliations
Review

Twenty Important Research Questions in Microbial Exposure and Social Equity

Jake M Robinson et al. mSystems. .

Abstract

Social and political policy, human activities, and environmental change affect the ways in which microbial communities assemble and interact with people. These factors determine how different social groups are exposed to beneficial and/or harmful microorganisms, meaning microbial exposure has an important socioecological justice context. Therefore, greater consideration of microbial exposure and social equity in research, planning, and policy is imperative. Here, we identify 20 research questions considered fundamentally important to promoting equitable exposure to beneficial microorganisms, along with safeguarding resilient societies and ecosystems. The 20 research questions we identified span seven broad themes, including the following: (i) sociocultural interactions; (ii) Indigenous community health and well-being; (iii) humans, urban ecosystems, and environmental processes; (iv) human psychology and mental health; (v) microbiomes and infectious diseases; (vi) human health and food security; and (vii) microbiome-related planning, policy, and outreach. Our goal was to summarize this growing field and to stimulate impactful research avenues while providing focus for funders and policymakers.

Keywords: biopolitics; health disparities; integrated research; microbiomes; social determinants of health; structural determinants; structural determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
A systems-level view of microbiomes, hosts, societies, and ecosystems, and strategies to meld social equity with biology, ecology, politics, or design (made with biorender).
FIG 2
FIG 2
Summary of methods and workflow.

References

    1. Ishaq SL, Parada FJ, Wolf PG, Bonilla CY, Carney MA, Benezra A, Wissel E, Friedman M, DeAngelis KM, Robinson JM, Fahimipour AK, Manus MB, Grieneisen L, Dietz LG, Pathak A, Chauhan A, Kuthyar S, Stewart JD, Dasari MR, Nonnamaker E, Choudoir M, Horve PF, Zimmerman NB, Kozik AJ, Darling KW, Romero-Olivares AL, Hariharan J, Farmer N, Maki KA, Collier JL, O’Doherty K, Letourneau J, Kline J, Moses PL, Morar N. 2021. Introducing the Microbes and Social Equity Working Group: considering the microbial components of social, environmental, and health justice. mSystems 6:e00471-21. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00471-21. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ishaq SL, Rapp M, Byerly R, McClellan LS, O’Boyle MR, Nykanen A, Fuller PJ, Aas C, Stone JM, Killpatrick S, Uptegrove MM, Vischer A, Wolf H, Smallman F, Eymann H, Narode S, Stapleton E, Cioffi CC, Tavalire HF. 2019. Framing the discussion of microorganisms as a facet of social equity in human health. PLoS Biol 17:e3000536. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000536. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antwis RE, Griffiths SM, Harrison XA, Aranega-Bou P, Arce A, Bettridge AS, Brailsford FL, de Menezes A, Devaynes A, Forbes KM, Fry EL, Goodhead I, Haskell E, Heys C, James C, Johnston SR, Lewis GR, Lewis Z, Macey MC, McCarthy A, McDonald JE, Mejia-Florez NL, O’Brien D, Orland C, Pautasso M, Reid WDK, Robinson HA, Wilson K, Sutherland WJ. 2017. Fifty important research questions in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93:fix044. doi:10.1093/femsec/fix044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA. 2011. Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy: identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2:238–247. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00083.x. - DOI
    1. Jones AC, Mead A, Kaiser MJ, Austen MCV, Adrian AW, Auchterlonie NA, Black KD, Blow LR, Bury C, Brown JH, Burnell GM, Connolly E, Dingwall A, Derrick S, Eno NC, Gautier DJH, Green KA, Gubbins M, Hart PR, Holmyard JM, Immink AJ, Jarrad DL, Katoh E, Langley JCR, Lee DO, Le Vay L, Leftwich CP, Mitchell M, Moore A, Murray AG, McLaren EMR, Norbury H, Parker D, Parry SO, Purchase D, Rahman A, Sanver F, Siggs M, Simpson SD, Slaski RJ, Smith K, Syvret MLQ, Tibbott C, Thomas PC, Turnbull J, Whiteley R, Whittles M, Wilcockson MJ, Wilson J, Dicks LV, Sutherland WJ. 2015. Prioritization of knowledge needs for sustainable aquaculture: a national and global perspective. Fish Fish 16:668–683. doi:10.1111/faf.12086. - DOI

Publication types