Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2145677.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45677.

Disruptions in Care for Medicare Beneficiaries With Severe Mental Illness During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Alisa B Busch  1   2 , Haiden A Huskamp  2 , Pushpa Raja  3 , Sherri Rose  4 , Ateev Mehrotra  2   5
Affiliations

Disruptions in Care for Medicare Beneficiaries With Severe Mental Illness During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Alisa B Busch et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Little is known about changes in care for individuals with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: To examine changes in mental health care during the pandemic and the use of telemedicine in outpatient care among Medicare beneficiaries with severe mental illness.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries (age ≥18 years) diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-related disorders or bipolar I disorder. Care patterns during January to September 2020 for a cohort defined in 2019 were compared with those during January to September 2019 for a cohort defined in 2018.

Exposures: Start of COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, defined as week 12 of 2020.

Main outcomes and measures: Use of mental health-related outpatient visits, emergency department visits, inpatient care, and oral prescription fills for antipsychotics and mood stabilizers during 4-week intervals. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined whether the pandemic was associated with differential changes in outpatient care across patient characteristics.

Results: The 2019 cohort of 686 214 individuals included 389 245 (53.8%) women, 114 073 (15.8%) Black and 526 301 (72.8%) White individuals, and 477 353 individuals (66.0%) younger than 65 years; the 2020 cohort of 723 045 individuals included 367 140 (53.5%) women, 106 699 (15.6%) Black and 497 885 (72.6%) White individuals, and 442 645 individuals (64.5%) younger than 65 years. Compared with 2019, there were large decreases during the pandemic's first month (calendar weeks 12-15) in individuals with outpatient visits (265 169 [36.7%] vs 200 590 [29.2%]; 20.3% decrease), with antipsychotic and mood stabilizer medication prescription fills (216 468 [29.9%] vs 163 796 [23.9%]; 20.3% decrease), with emergency department visits (12 383 [1.7%] vs 8503 [1.2%]; 27.7% decrease), and with hospital admissions (11 564 [1.6%] vs 7912 [1.2%]; 27.9% decrease). By weeks 32 to 35 of 2020, utilization rebounded but remained lower than in 2019, ranging from a relative decrease of 2.5% (outpatient visits) to 12.9% (admissions). During the full pandemic period (weeks 12-39) in 2020, 1 556 403 of 2 743 553 outpatient visits (56.7%) were provided via telemedicine. In multivariable analyses, outpatient visit use during weeks 12 to 25 of 2020 was lower among those with disability (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96), and during weeks 26 to 39 of 2020, it was lower among Black vs non-Hispanic White individuals (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99) and those with dual Medicaid eligibility (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, despite greater use of telemedicine, individuals with severe mental illness experienced large disruptions in care early in the pandemic. These narrowed but persisted through September 2020. Disruptions were greater for several disadvantaged populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Proportion of Outpatient Mental Health Visits Conducted via Telemedicine in 2020
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Differences in Outpatient Mental Health Utilization, 2019 vs 2020
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Differences in Mental Health Emergency Department, Hospitalization, and Medication Utilization, 2019 vs 2020
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kozloff N, Mulsant BH, Stergiopoulos V, Voineskos AN. The COVID-19 global pandemic: implications for people with schizophrenia and related disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2020;46(4):752-757. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa051 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shinn AK, Viron M. Perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic and individuals with severe mental illness. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(3):20com13412. doi:10.4088/JCP.20com13412 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kasckow J, Felmet K, Appelt C, Thompson R, Rotondi A, Haas G. Telepsychiatry in the assessment and treatment of schizophrenia. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2014;8(1):21-27A. doi:10.3371/CSRP.KAFE.021513 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santesteban-Echarri O, Piskulic D, Nyman RK, Addington J. Telehealth interventions for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and clinical high-risk for psychosis individuals: a scoping review. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(1-2):14-20. doi:10.1177/1357633X18794100 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Young AS, Cohen AN, Niv N, et al. . Mobile phone and smartphone use by people with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2020;71(3):280-283. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201900203 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types