Microfluidic Squeezing Enables MHC Class I Antigen Presentation by Diverse Immune Cells to Elicit CD8+ T Cell Responses with Antitumor Activity
- PMID: 35091434
- PMCID: PMC9012083
- DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100656
Microfluidic Squeezing Enables MHC Class I Antigen Presentation by Diverse Immune Cells to Elicit CD8+ T Cell Responses with Antitumor Activity
Abstract
CD8+ T cell responses are the foundation of the recent clinical success of immunotherapy in oncologic indications. Although checkpoint inhibitors have enhanced the activity of existing CD8+ T cell responses, therapeutic approaches to generate Ag-specific CD8+ T cell responses have had limited success. Here, we demonstrate that cytosolic delivery of Ag through microfluidic squeezing enables MHC class I presentation to CD8+ T cells by diverse cell types. In murine dendritic cells (DCs), squeezed DCs were ∼1000-fold more potent at eliciting CD8+ T cell responses than DCs cross-presenting the same amount of protein Ag. The approach also enabled engineering of less conventional APCs, such as T cells, for effective priming of CD8+ T cells in vitro and in vivo. Mixtures of immune cells, such as murine splenocytes, also elicited CD8+ T cell responses in vivo when squeezed with Ag. We demonstrate that squeezing enables effective MHC class I presentation by human DCs, T cells, B cells, and PBMCs and that, in clinical scale formats, the system can squeeze up to 2 billion cells per minute. Using the human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) murine model, TC-1, we demonstrate that squeezed B cells, T cells, and unfractionated splenocytes elicit antitumor immunity and correlate with an influx of HPV-specific CD8+ T cells such that >80% of CD8s in the tumor were HPV specific. Together, these findings demonstrate the potential of cytosolic Ag delivery to drive robust CD8+ T cell responses and illustrate the potential for an autologous cell-based vaccine with minimal turnaround time for patients.
Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
M.G.B., K.A.H., A Stockmann, L.T., E.H., D.S., A.V., C.Y., E.I.O., O.P., C.S., K.V., K.B., I.V.-S., D.Y., M.M., A.M., J.C., L.P., L. Talarico, M.K.J., E.C., J.T.G., T.A., H.A., H.B., A. Sharei, and S.M.L. are or were employed by SQZ Biotech. H.K., C.T., and P.U. are employed by Roche, which has a partnership with SQZ Biotech. R.L., K.F.J., and U.H.v.A. consult for SQZ Biotech. The other authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Schachter J., Ribas A., Long G. V., Arance A., Grob J.-J., Mortier L., Daud A., Carlino M. S., McNeil C., Lotem M., et al. 2017. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet 390: 1853–1862. - PubMed
-
- Larkin J., Hodi F. S., Wolchok J. D.. 2015. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. [Published erratum appears in 2018 N. Engl. J. Med. 379: 2185.] N. Engl. J. Med. 373: 1270–1271. - PubMed
-
- Burg, van der S. H., Arens R., Ossendorp F., van Hall T., Melief C. J. M.. 2016. Vaccines for established cancer: overcoming the challenges posed by immune evasion. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16: 219–233. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
