Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;132(10):1971-1975.
doi: 10.1002/lary.30037. Epub 2022 Jan 29.

Bereavement Practices Among Head and Neck Cancer Surgeons

Roberto N Solis  1 , Nicole I Farber  1 , Nathan Fairman  2 , Nuen T Yang  3 , Sandra L Taylor  3 , Marianne Abouyared  1 , Arnaud F Bewley  1 , D Gregory Farwell  1 , Andrew C Birkeland  1
Affiliations

Bereavement Practices Among Head and Neck Cancer Surgeons

Roberto N Solis et al. Laryngoscope. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: Head and neck cancer surgeons frequently interact with dying patients with advanced disease and their families, but little is known about their bereavement practices after a patient's death. The aim of this study is to elucidate the frequency of common bereavement practices, cited barriers to bereavement, and predictive physician factors that lead to an increase in bereavement practices among head and neck cancer surgeons.

Methods: A 20-item survey was sent to 827 active surgeons of the American Head and Neck Society. Approval was obtained and the survey was distributed through the American Head and Neck Society. Demographics, frequency of common bereavement practices, empathy, and barriers were assessed. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine physician factors associated with more frequent bereavement follow-up.

Results: There were 156 respondents (18.9% response rate). Overall, surgeons were more likely to usually/always call (48.5%) or send a letter (42.4%) compared with other practices such as attending funerals (0%), offering family meetings (18.6%), or referring family members to counseling (7.7%). Many barriers were cited as being at least somewhat important: being unaware about a patient's death (67.3%) was the most cited, whereas 51.3% cited a lack of mentorship/training in this area. Scoring higher on empathy questions (P ≤ .001) was associated with more frequent surgeon bereavement follow-up with the family of deceased patients.

Conclusion: There is substantial practice variation among surgeons suggesting a lack of consensus on their roles in bereavement follow-up. Having higher empathy was predictive of higher engagement.

Level of evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 132:1971-1975, 2022.

Keywords: Bereavement; cancer; death; head and neck; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Pulte D, Brenner H. Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: a period analysis. Oncologist 2010;15:994–1001. 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0289. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel J. Head and neck cancer: statistics. Cancer. Net Accessed July 2021,
    1. Kacel E, Gao X, Prigerson HG. Understanding bereavement: what every oncology practitioner should know. J Support Oncol 2011;9:172–180. 10.1016/j.suponc.2011.04.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jansma FF, Schure LM, de Jong BM. Support requirements for caregivers of patients with palliative cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2005;58:182–186. 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milberg A, Olsson EC, Jakobsson M, Olsson M, Friedrichsen M. Family members’ perceived needs for bereavement follow-up. J Pain Symptom Manage 2008;35:58–69. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.039. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types