Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul;51(7):1687-1697.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01692-x. Epub 2022 Jan 29.

Food web assessments in the Baltic Sea: Models bridging the gap between indicators and policy needs

Affiliations
Review

Food web assessments in the Baltic Sea: Models bridging the gap between indicators and policy needs

Samuli Korpinen et al. Ambio. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Ecosystem-based management requires understanding of food webs. Consequently, assessment of food web status is mandatory according to the European Union's Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) for EU Member States. However, how to best monitor and assess food webs in practise has proven a challenging question. Here, we review and assess the current status of food web indicators and food web models, and discuss whether the models can help addressing current shortcomings of indicator-based food web assessments, using the Baltic Sea as an example region. We show that although the MSFD food web assessment was designed to use food web indicators alone, they are currently poorly fit for the purpose, because they lack interconnectivity of trophic guilds. We then argue that the multiple food web models published for this region have a high potential to provide additional coherence to the definition of good environmental status, the evaluation of uncertainties, and estimates for unsampled indicator values, but we also identify current limitations that stand in the way of more formal implementation of this approach. We close with a discussion of which current models have the best capacity for this purpose in the Baltic Sea, and of the way forward towards the combination of measurable indicators and modelling approaches in food web assessments.

Keywords: Baltic Sea; Ecosystem-based management; Food web assessment; Food web indicators; Food web models; Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bauer B, Meier HEM, Casini M, Hoff A, Margoński P, Orio A, et al. Reducing eutrophication increases spatial extent of communities supporting commercial fisheries: A model case study. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2018;75:1306–1317. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsy003. - DOI
    1. Bauer B, Gustafsson BG, Hyytiäinen K, Meier HEM, Müller-Karulis B, Saraiva S, Tomczak MT. Food web and fisheries in the future Baltic Sea. Ambio. 2019;48:1337–1349. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01229-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blenckner T, Llope M, Möllmann C, Voss R, Quaas MF, Casini M, et al. Climate and fishing steer ecosystem regeneration to uncertain economic futures. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2015;282:20142809. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2809. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borja A, Elliott M, Andersen JH, Berg T, Carstensen J, Halpern BS, et al. Overview of integrative assessment of marine systems: The ecosystem approach in practice. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2016;3:20.
    1. Bossier S, Palacz AP, Nielsen JR, Christensen A, Hoff A, Maar M, et al. The Baltic sea Atlantis: An integrated end-to-end modelling framework evaluating ecosystem-wide effects of human-induced pressures. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0199168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199168. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources