Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 31;50(5):519-527.
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0476. Print 2022 Jun 27.

Ethical considerations of maternal-fetal surgery

Abigail C Rousseau  1 , Kirsten A Riggan  1 , Mauro H Schenone  2 , Kevin J Whitford  3 , Siobhan T Pittock  4 , Megan A Allyse  1   5
Affiliations
Review

Ethical considerations of maternal-fetal surgery

Abigail C Rousseau et al. J Perinat Med. .

Abstract

The practice of maternal-fetal surgery (MFS) has expanded from lethal fetal conditions to conditions which are significantly disabling but not a lethal fetal abnormality. The inclusion of myelomeningocele within the scope of MFS in the 1990s sparked a renewed debate over the ethics of MFS. While demonstrating increasing efficacy and range of application, MFS continues to be ethically fraught due to the inherent tension between maternal and fetal interests. Ethical issues central to MFS include the patienthood of the fetus; the balance of risks and benefits between the woman and fetus; informed consent for experimental procedures; and determination of conditions that meet ethical qualifications for MFS intervention. These concerns are likely to persist and evolve as perinatal medicine continues to advance. Here we summarize the current state of MFS ethics, highlighting the major positions in the literature thus far as well as examine future directions. It is essential robust discussions of these important issues continue both to ensure ethical medical practice and to provide support to clinicians, pregnant women, and their families.

Keywords: ethics; maternal-fetal surgery; prenatal intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radic, JAE, Illes, J, Mcdonald, PJ. Fetal repair of open neural tube defects: ethical, legal, and social issues. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2019;28:476–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180119000409.
    1. Senat, M-V, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, Paupe, A, Winer, N, Ville, Y. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004;351:136–44. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa032597.
    1. Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, Brock, JW, Burrows, PK, Johnson, MP, et al.. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 2011;364:993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1014379.
    1. Moreira de Sá, RA, Nassar de Carvalho, PR, Kurjak, A, Adra, A, Dayyabu, AL, Ebrashy, A, et al.. Is intrauterine surgery justified? Report from the working group on ultrasound in obstetrics of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM). J Perinat Med 2016;44:737–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2015-0132.
    1. Van Calenbergh, F, Joyeux, L, Deprest, J. Maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: some thoughts on ethical, legal, and psychological issues in a Western European situation. Childs Nerv Syst 2017;33:1247–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3446-6.

LinkOut - more resources