Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;407(1):75-86.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02411-6. Epub 2022 Jan 30.

Techniques for reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for cancer: updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

Techniques for reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for cancer: updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Francesca Lombardo et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The choice of the best reconstruction technique after distal gastrectomy (DG) remains controversial and still not defined. The purpose was to perform a comprehensive evaluation within the major type of intestinal reconstruction after DG for gastric cancer.

Methods: Systematic review and network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare Billroth I (BI), Billroth II (BII), Billroth II Braun (BII Braun), Roux-en-Y (RY), and Uncut Roux-en-Y (URY). Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as pooled effect size measures while 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used to assess relative inference.

Results: Ten RCTs (1456 patients) were included. Of these, 448 (33.7%) underwent BI, 220 (15.1%) BII, 114 BII Braun (7.8%), 533 (36.6%) RY, and 141 URY (9.6%). No significant differences were found among treatments for 30-day mortality, anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, and overall complications. At 12-month follow-up, RY was associated with a significantly reduced risk of remnant gastritis compared to BI (RR=0.56; 95% Crl 0.35-0.76) and BII reconstruction (RR=0.47; 95% Crl 0.22-0.97). Similarly, despite the lack of statistical significance, RY seems associated with a trend toward reduced endoscopically proven esophagitis compared to BI (RR=0.58; 95% Crl 0.24-1.51) and bile reflux compared to BI (RR=0.48; 95% Crl 0.17-1.41), BII (RR=0.74; 95% Crl 0.20-2.81), and BII Braun (RR=0.65; 95% Crl 0.30-1.43).

Conclusions: This network meta-analysis shows that there are five main options for intestinal anastomosis after DG. All techniques seem equally safe with comparable anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, overall morbidity, and short-term outcomes. In the short-term follow-up (12 months), RY seems associated with a reduced risk of remnant gastritis and a trend toward a reduced risk of bile reflux and esophagitis.

Keywords: Billroth I; Billroth II; Billroth II Braun; Network meta-analysis; Roux-en-Y.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Osugi H, Fukuhara K, Takada N, Takemura M, Kinoshita H (2004) Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy to prevent remnant gastritis. Hepatogastroenterology 51(58):1215–1218 - PubMed
    1. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135(7):806–810. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.135.7.806 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sato T, Miwa K, Sahara H, Segawa M, Hattori T (2002) The sequential model of Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma induced by duodeno-esophageal reflux without exogenous carcinogens. Anticancer Res 22(1A):39–44 - PubMed
    1. Fein M, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P et al (1998) Duodenoesophageal reflux induces esophageal adenocarcinoma without exogenous carcinogen. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2(3):260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80021-8 - DOI
    1. Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Javed MA et al (2013) Roux-en-Y versus billroth I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 19(7):1124–1134. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i7.1124 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources