Techniques for reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for cancer: updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 35094151
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02411-6
Techniques for reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for cancer: updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background: The choice of the best reconstruction technique after distal gastrectomy (DG) remains controversial and still not defined. The purpose was to perform a comprehensive evaluation within the major type of intestinal reconstruction after DG for gastric cancer.
Methods: Systematic review and network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare Billroth I (BI), Billroth II (BII), Billroth II Braun (BII Braun), Roux-en-Y (RY), and Uncut Roux-en-Y (URY). Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as pooled effect size measures while 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used to assess relative inference.
Results: Ten RCTs (1456 patients) were included. Of these, 448 (33.7%) underwent BI, 220 (15.1%) BII, 114 BII Braun (7.8%), 533 (36.6%) RY, and 141 URY (9.6%). No significant differences were found among treatments for 30-day mortality, anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, and overall complications. At 12-month follow-up, RY was associated with a significantly reduced risk of remnant gastritis compared to BI (RR=0.56; 95% Crl 0.35-0.76) and BII reconstruction (RR=0.47; 95% Crl 0.22-0.97). Similarly, despite the lack of statistical significance, RY seems associated with a trend toward reduced endoscopically proven esophagitis compared to BI (RR=0.58; 95% Crl 0.24-1.51) and bile reflux compared to BI (RR=0.48; 95% Crl 0.17-1.41), BII (RR=0.74; 95% Crl 0.20-2.81), and BII Braun (RR=0.65; 95% Crl 0.30-1.43).
Conclusions: This network meta-analysis shows that there are five main options for intestinal anastomosis after DG. All techniques seem equally safe with comparable anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, overall morbidity, and short-term outcomes. In the short-term follow-up (12 months), RY seems associated with a reduced risk of remnant gastritis and a trend toward a reduced risk of bile reflux and esophagitis.
Keywords: Billroth I; Billroth II; Billroth II Braun; Network meta-analysis; Roux-en-Y.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Osugi H, Fukuhara K, Takada N, Takemura M, Kinoshita H (2004) Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy to prevent remnant gastritis. Hepatogastroenterology 51(58):1215–1218 - PubMed
-
- Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135(7):806–810. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.135.7.806 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sato T, Miwa K, Sahara H, Segawa M, Hattori T (2002) The sequential model of Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma induced by duodeno-esophageal reflux without exogenous carcinogens. Anticancer Res 22(1A):39–44 - PubMed
-
- Fein M, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P et al (1998) Duodenoesophageal reflux induces esophageal adenocarcinoma without exogenous carcinogen. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2(3):260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80021-8 - DOI
-
- Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Javed MA et al (2013) Roux-en-Y versus billroth I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 19(7):1124–1134. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i7.1124 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
