Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;33(1):1-17.
doi: 10.1007/s11266-022-00455-w. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

Inequality in Volunteering: Building a New Research Front

Affiliations

Inequality in Volunteering: Building a New Research Front

Lesley Hustinx et al. Voluntas. 2022.

Abstract

Volunteering research focuses predominantly on predicting participation in volunteering, proceeding from the quasi-hegemonic foundation of resource theory and dominant-status theory. Empirical research in this tradition has provided extremely robust evidence that dominant groups in society are more likely to volunteer. At the same time, it has reinforced the status quo in the production of knowledge on volunteering, thereby neglecting the clear problematic of "inequality in volunteering." Compared to the guiding question of "participation," the concept of "inequality" can generate a more variegated, critical, and change-oriented research agenda. With this special issue, we aim to build a "new research front" in the field of volunteering. In this introduction, we advance a novel research agenda structured around a multidimensional understanding of inequality, concomitantly delineating four central research programs focusing on (a) resources, (b) interactions, (c) governmentalities, and (d) epistemologies. We discuss the focus of these lines of research in greater detail with respect to inequality in volunteering, their main critique of dominant research on participation in volunteering, and key elements of the new research agenda.

Keywords: Epistemic inequality; Governmentalities of volunteering; Inequality in volunteering; Interaction-based inequality; Resource inequality; Social theory; Volunteering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Ackermann K, Manatschal A. Online volunteering as a means to overcome unequal participation? The profiles of online and offline volunteers compared. New Media & Society. 2018;20(12):4453–4472. doi: 10.1177/1461444818775698. - DOI
    1. Alcoff L. Mignolo’s epistemology of coloniality. CR: The New Centennial Review. 2007;7(3):79–101. doi: 10.1353/ncr.0.0008. - DOI
    1. Baillie Smith, M., Fadel, B., O’Loghlen, A., & Hazeldine, S. (2021). Volunteering hierarchies in the global south: Remuneration and livelihoods. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Online First.
    1. Baillie Smith, M., Thomas, N., & Hazeldine, S. (2019). Rethinking volunteering and cosmopolitanism: Beyond individual mobilities and personal transformations. Geopolitics, 1–23.
    1. Baker M. Modernity/coloniality and eurocentric education: Towards a post-occidental self-understanding of the present. Policy Futures in Education. 2012;10(1):4–22. doi: 10.2304/pfie.2012.10.1.4. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources