Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 21;9(1):33-41.
doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v9i1.177. eCollection 2022.

New Trends and Evidence for the Management of Renal Angiomyolipoma: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

New Trends and Evidence for the Management of Renal Angiomyolipoma: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of the Literature

Juan Camilo Álvarez Restrepo et al. J Kidney Cancer VHL. .

Abstract

Treatment of renal angiomyolipoma (AML) seeks to reduce related complications and preserve kidney function. The purpose of this article was to perform an updated literature review on the diagnosis, therapeutic options, and criteria for invasive intervention in patients with renal AML. Computerized tomography is the standard diagnostic method for renal AML, while definitive diagnosis is made by histopathology. The management of choice in most cases is active surveillance (AS), with a clinical and imaging follow-up protocol. In high-risk cases, therapeutic management should be considered, with alternatives such as selective arterial embolization (SAE), nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), and mTOR inhibitors in selected patients. Renal AML in women of childbearing age, those with growth >0.25 cm/year, intralesional aneurysms >5 mm, and clinically significant symptoms may qualify for active treatment. Despite the limitations derived from the available evidence, it is possible to consider SAE, NSS, and the use of mTOR inhibitors as management alternatives for selected patients.

Keywords: angiomyolipoma; diagnosis; kidney neoplasms; review; therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors of this manuscript have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Literature review algorithm.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Proposed updated management algorithm. RCC – renal cell carcinoma; AML – angiomyolipoma; TSC – tuberous sclerosis complex; MRI – magnetic resonance imaging; US – ultrasound; CT – computerized tomography. *Associated with other risk factors, according to medical criteria. **See characteristics and risk factors in “epithelioid AML.”

References

    1. Kuusk T, Biancari F, Lane B, Tobert C, Campbell S, Rimon U, et al. . Treatment of renal angiomyolipoma: Pooled analysis of individual patient data. BMC Urol. 2015;15:123. 10.1186/s12894-015-0118-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang SF, Lo WO. Benign neoplasm of kidney: Angiomyolipoma. J Med Ultrasound. 2018;26(3):119–22. 10.4103/JMU.JMU_48_18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flum AS, Hamoui N, Said MA, Yang XJ, Casalino DD, McGuire BB, et al. . Update on the diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 2016;195(4 Pt 1):834–46. 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.126 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murad Gutiérrez V, Aponte Barrios WO, Romero Enciso JA. Angiomiolipoma renal: nuevas perspectivas [Renal angiomyolipoma: New perspectives]. Rev Colomb Urol. 2016;25(1):16–24. [Article in Spanish]. 10.1016/j.uroco.2015.12.009 - DOI
    1. Urciuoli P, D’Orazi V, Livadoti G, Foresi E, Panunzi A, Anichini S, et al. . Treatment of renal angiomyolipoma: Surgery versus angioembolization. G Chir. 2013;34(11–12):326–31. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources