Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 12:11:818969.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.818969. eCollection 2021.

African Swine Fever Virus MGF360-14L Negatively Regulates Type I Interferon Signaling by Targeting IRF3

Affiliations

African Swine Fever Virus MGF360-14L Negatively Regulates Type I Interferon Signaling by Targeting IRF3

Yang Wang et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is a devastating infectious disease caused by African swine fever virus (ASFV). The ASFV genome encodes multiple structural and non-structural proteins that contribute to evasion of host immunity. In this study, we determined that the viral non-structural protein MGF360-14L inhibits interferon-β (IFN-β) promoter activity induced by cGAS-STING signaling. MGF360-14L was also found to downregulate expression of the IRF3 protein and promote its degradation through ubiquitin-meditated proteolysis. Moreover, MGF360-14L was shown to interact with and destabilize IRF3 by facilitating E3 ligase TRIM21-mediated K63-linked ubiquitination of IRF3. Overall, our study revealed that MGF360-14L promotes degradation of IRF3 through TRIM21, thereby inhibiting type I interferon production. These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying ASFV immune evasion.

Keywords: African swine fever virus; IRF3; immune evasion; interferon; ubiquitination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MGF360-14L inhibited IFN-β mRNA production and IFN-β promoter activity. PK-15 (A) and HEK293T (B) cells were transfected with MGF360-14L plasmids and 5 μg/mL of poly(I:C) for 24 h and then harvested for qRT-PCR assay to determine IFN-β mRNA levels. MGF360-14L inhibited cGAS/STING-mediated activation of IFN-β (C), and the inhibitory effect was dose-dependent (D). HEK293T cells were co-transfected with IFN-β-luc (20 ng), pRL-TK (2 ng), cGAS-HA (10 ng), STING-HA (40 ng), or the pcDNA3.1-HA empty vector (50 ng) and MGF360-14L-Flag (0 ng, 50 ng, 100 ng, 200 ng). Luciferase activity was detected at 24 h post-transfection. Expression of cGAS-HA, STING-HA, and MGF360-14L-Flag was analyzed by western blotting. (E, F) MGF360-14L inhibited cGAS/STING-mediated mRNA and protein levels of IFN-β. HEK293T cells were co-transfected with cGAS-HA (100 ng), STING-HA (100 ng), or the pcDNA3.1-HA empty vector (100 ng) and MGF360-14L-Flag (0 ng, 50 ng, 100 ng, 200 ng). The mRNA level of interferon-β in cell lysate was detected by qPCR, and the protein expression level of interferon-β in supernatant was detected by ELISA. Data shown are the mean ± SEM; *p < 0.001, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001. Representative results are from at least three independent experiments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MGF360-14L inhibits IRF3-mediated IFN-β promoter activation. (A, B) HEK293T cells were co-transfected with IFN-β-luc (20 ng), pRL-TK (2 ng), TBK1 (50 ng) or IRF3-5D (50 ng), and MGF360-14L-Flag (50 ng) or empty plasmid. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were treated and analyzed using dual-luciferase reporter assays. (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with MGF360-14L-Flag (0 ng, 200 ng, 400 ng and 600 ng) or empty vector. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with IRF3-HA (200 ng) and MGF360-14L-Flag (0 ng, 200 ng, 400 ng, and 600 ng) or empty vector. (E) HEK293T cells transfected with MGF360-14L-eGFP and then treated with DMSO or MG132 (25 μM), CQ (50 μM), 3-MA (10 mM) and Z-VAD-FMK (20 μM) for 6 h. Expression of IRF3, IRF3-HA, TBK1-HA, IRF3-5D-HA, MGF360-14L-Flag and GAPDH were assessed by western blot analysis. Data shown are the mean ± SEM; **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001. Representative results are from at least three independent experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MGF360-14L interacts with TRIM21. (A) IP samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue; exogenously expressed MGF360-14L is indicated by the red box. (B) MS analysis of MGF360-14L-associated proteins, following by Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. High-scoring peptides were listed in the table. (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with MGF360-14L-Flag and TRIM21-HA plasmids. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with MGF360-14L-Flag plasmids for 18 h and then incubated with SeV (1MOI) for 6 h. The cells were lysed and subjected to IP using anti-Flag, anti-HA monoclonal antibodies or control IgG. Precipitates were analyzed by western blot. (E) PK-15 cells were transfected with MGF360-14L-Flag and TRIM21-HA plasmids. At 24 h after transfection, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton™ X-100, blocked with 5% BSA, and then treated with primary antibody and secondary antibody. Finally, laser confocal microscopy was performed after DAPI nuclear staining.
Figure 4
Figure 4
MGF360-14L destabilizes IRF3. (A, B) HEK293T cells were co-transfected with IFN-β-luc (20 ng), pRL-TK (2 ng), cGAS (10 ng), STING (40 ng) or IRF3-5D-HA (50 ng), MGF360-14L-Flag (50 ng), and TRIM21-HA (50 ng) or empty plasmid. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were treated and analyzed using dual-luciferase reporter assays. (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with MGF360-14L-Flag (500 ng), TRIM21-Myc (500 ng), IRF3-HA (500 ng) or empty plasmids. (D) HEK293Tcells were transfected with MGF360-14L-Flag (500 ng), sh-TRIM21 (500 ng,1000 ng) or empty plasmid. (E) HEK293T cells were transfected with MGF360-14L-eGFP (or MGF360-14L-Flag), TRIM21-Myc and IRF3-Flag (or IRF3-HA) plasmids. (F) HEK293T cells were transfected with MGF360-14L-Flag plasmids for 18h and then incubated with SeV (1MOI) for 6 h. The cells were lysed, and subjected to IP using anti-Flag or control IgG. Precipitates were analyzed by WB. (G, H) IP with anti-Flag beads analysis of lysates of HEK293T cells transfected with Ub-HA, or Ub-K48-HA, or Ub-K63-HA, TRIM21-Myc, MGF360-14L-eGFP and IRF3-Flag for 24h. (I) IP with anti-IRF3 beads analysis of lysates of HEK293T cells transfected with Ub-HA, or Ub-K63-HA, shTRIM21 and MGF360-14L-eGFP for 24h. Expression of MGF360-14L-Flag (or MGF360-14L-eGFP), TRM21-Myc (or TRIM21-HA), IRF3-HA (or IRF3-Flag),Ub-HA, Ub-K48-HA, Ub-K63-HA and GAPDH were assessed by Western blot analysis. Data shown are the mean ± SEM; *p < 0.001, **p < 0.001. Representative results are from at least three independent experiments.

References

    1. Alonso C., Borca M., Dixon L., Revilla Y., Rodriguez F., Escribano J. M. (2018). ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Asfarviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 99 (5), 613–614. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001049 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borca M. V., O’Donnell V., Holinka L. G., Sanford B., Azzinaro P. A., Risatti G. R. (2017). Development of a Fluorescent ASFV Strain That Retains the Ability to Cause Disease in Swine. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep46747 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cai X., Chiu Y. H., Chen Z. J. (2014). The cGAS-cGAMP-STING Pathway of Cytosolic DNA Sensing and Signaling. Mol. Cell. 54 (2), 289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.040 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Correia S., Ventura S., Parkhouse R. M. (2013). Identification and Utility of Innate Immune System Evasion Mechanisms of ASFV. Virus Res. 173 (1), 87–100. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cunha A. (2012). Pathogen and Xenobiotic Sensing—Back to Basics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12 (6), 400–401. doi: 10.1038/nri3237 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms