Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 14:4:772294.
doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.772294. eCollection 2021.

Quantum Propensity in Economics

Affiliations

Quantum Propensity in Economics

David Orrell et al. Front Artif Intell. .

Abstract

This paper describes an approach to economics that is inspired by quantum computing, and is motivated by the need to develop a consistent quantum mathematical framework for economics. The traditional neoclassical approach assumes that rational utility-optimisers drive market prices to a stable equilibrium, subject to external perturbations or market failures. While this approach has been highly influential, it has come under increasing criticism following the financial crisis of 2007/8. The quantum approach, in contrast, is inherently probabilistic and dynamic. Decision-makers are described, not by a utility function, but by a propensity function which specifies the probability of transacting. We show how a number of cognitive phenomena such as preference reversal and the disjunction effect can be modelled by using a simple quantum circuit to generate an appropriate propensity function. Conversely, a general propensity function can be quantized, via an entropic force, to incorporate effects such as interference and entanglement that characterise human decision-making. Applications to some common problems and topics in economics and finance, including the use of quantum artificial intelligence, are discussed.

Keywords: quantum artificial intelligence; quantum cognition; quantum computing; quantum decision theory; quantum economics; quantum finance; quantum probability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) A coin toss for a balanced coin can be expressed as a superposition of two states, heads and tails. (B) because the 2-norm of a probability is its square, we can also consider negative projections. (C) Applying the Hadamard transformation rotates S1 by 45 degrees clockwise which aligns with the H axis (S3).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The order effect for two questions labelled A and B. The state vector (grey line) is at an angle θ to the axes for A. The axes for B are rotated by an angle φ to those for A.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Quantum circuit for a decision B influenced by a context A.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The curves show propensity as a function of price, measured in millions of dollars. Both are centered at p = 1, but the panel on the right has a higher level of price flexibility. The arrows indicate the strength and direction of the associated entropic forces (discussed later).

References

    1. Aaronson S. (2013). Quantum Computing since Democritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Ahn K., Choi M. Y., Dai B., Sohn S., Yang B. (2017). Modeling Stock Return Distributions with a Quantum Harmonic Oscillator. EPL 120 (3), 38003. 10.1209/0295-5075/120/38003 - DOI
    1. Anonymous (2021). Schrödinger’s Markets. London: The Economist.
    1. Baaquie B. E. (2004). Quantum Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Blutner R., Graben B. P. (2016). Quantum cognition and bounded rationality. Synthese 193, 3239–3291. 10.1007/s11229-015-0928-5 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources