Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;56(7):724-735.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14735. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

Patients' perspectives on medical students' professionalism: Blind spots and opportunities

Simon Haney  1 , Paula Rowland  1   2   3 , Shiphra Ginsburg  1   4   3   5
Affiliations

Patients' perspectives on medical students' professionalism: Blind spots and opportunities

Simon Haney et al. Med Educ. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Research has acknowledged the value of patients as essential stakeholders in medical education, yet educators have not adequately incorporated patients' perspectives into medical students' developing professionalism. Our purpose was to explore patients' perceptions of professional behaviour in medical students as a first step to considering patients' potential roles in assessing professionalism.

Methods: Building on the existing framework of the 'disavowed curriculum', we used a constructivist grounded theory approach to interview and analyse data from 19 patients (11 W, 8 M) at one urban hospital. Each participant watched five video scenarios that depict professionally challenging situations commonly faced by medical students, after which they were asked to put themselves in the position of both the patient and the student depicted in each scenario, and to discuss what they felt would be appropriate or inappropriate behaviours from each perspective.

Results: Patients' responses replicated all elements of the disavowed curriculum, including principles of professionalism, the student's affect or internal factors, and potential implications of actions. Their responses reflected avowed, unavowed and disavowed rationales. Participants also identified novel principles, including hide dissension in the ranks, respect privacy, advocate for yourself and have trust in the system. Patients conveyed an understanding of the multiple competing factors students must balance (e.g., providing optimal care while maximising educational opportunities) and appeared to empathise with some of the pressures students face.

Conclusions: Our findings point to significant blind spots in previous research based on faculty and student perspectives of professionalism. Knowing what patients perceive as important will allow educational and assessment efforts to be refined to reflect their values. Our work begins the process of understanding how best to include patients in the assessment of medical learners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Berger AS, Niedra E, Brooks SG, Ahmed WS, Ginsburg S. Teaching professionalism in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. Acad med. 2020;95(6):938-946. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002987
    1. Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, Harrison M, Usherwood T, Nass D. Teaching professionalism in medical education: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 25. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):e1252-e1266. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.789132
    1. @cpso_ca. A deeper look into our complaints data. Dialogue 15: @cpso_ca; 2019.
    1. Ginsburg S, Lingard L, Regehr G, Underwood K. Know when to rock the boat: how faculty rationalize students' behaviors. J Gen Intern med. 2008;23(7):942-947. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0401-3
    1. Ginsburg S, Bernabeo E, Ross KM, Holmboe ES. ‘It depends’: results of a qualitative study investigating how practicing internists approach professional dilemmas. Acad med. 2012;87(12):1685-1693. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182736dfc

LinkOut - more resources