Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1986 Jan;67(1):29-32.

Comparison of lavage or intravenous antibiotics at cesarean section

  • PMID: 3510014
Clinical Trial

Comparison of lavage or intravenous antibiotics at cesarean section

J P Elliott et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jan.

Abstract

The route of administration of prophylactic antibiotics was studied in a randomized prospective trial. Cefoxitin was administered to high-risk patients at cesarean section by three treatment regimens: intravenous antibiotic (2 g) for eight doses, irrigation of uterus and peritoneum with 2 g of antibiotic, and a combination of intravenous and irrigation as described. A control group received no antibiotic prophylaxis. The incidence of febrile morbidity was similar in each treatment group: intravenous, two of 39 (5%); irrigation, three of 42 (7%); intravenous and irrigation, two of 38 (5%), and were all significantly lower than the control group 14 of 39 (36%) (P less than .05). Similar results were found when prevention of endometritis was the end point: intravenous, two of 39 (5%); irrigation, two of 42 (5%); intravenous and irrigation, two of 38 (5%) compared with 13 of 39 (33%) in the control group (P less than .05). Administration of antibiotics by irrigation is equally effective in preventing postoperative febrile morbidity and endomyometritis as intravenous dosing and a combination of intravenous and irrigation. This affords a potential cost savings.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources