Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation
- PMID: 3510015
Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation
Abstract
This prospective screening program of a large obstetric population was designed to determine the effectiveness of ultrasonic biometry to diagnose intrauterine growth retardation. The results of 3616 pregnancies were analyzed. All pregnancies were dated before the 24th week by ultrasonic measurements. The study compared the effectiveness of three ultrasonic growth parameters: biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference, and abdominal circumference, to detect intrauterine growth retardation and to determine the optimal gestational age to perform the scan for this purpose. To maintain a high sensitivity required in a screening program, all ultrasonic measurements below the 25th percentile for gestational age were considered abnormal. The predictive value of a positive test in this situation ranged from 0.25 to 0.55, depending on the week of gestation in which the scan was performed. Accuracy of predictions improved greatly when the scans were performed within two weeks of delivery. Abdominal circumference measurements were more predictive of intrauterine growth retardation than either head circumference or BPD measurements or the combination of these parameters. In view of the sensitivity of the test and the prevalence of the disorder, it is concluded that 34 +/- 1 weeks of gestation is the optimal time to screen patients ultrasonically for intrauterine growth retardation.
Similar articles
-
Intrauterine growth in twin pregnancies: prediction of fetal growth retardation.Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jul;66(1):63-8. Obstet Gynecol. 1985. PMID: 3892389
-
Measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter by ultrasound is not an accurate method of detecting fetal growth retardation.N Z Med J. 1981 Oct 28;94(694):312-4. N Z Med J. 1981. PMID: 6948199
-
Ultrasonic diagnosis of discordant fetal growth in twin gestations.Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):363-7. Obstet Gynecol. 1987. PMID: 3547212
-
Intrauterine growth retardation.Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1985;21(5):109-30. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1985. PMID: 3904858 Review.
-
Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation: the use of sequential measurements of fetal growth parameters.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Dec;30(4):968-84. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198712000-00020. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1987. PMID: 3319327 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic accuracy of fundal height and handheld ultrasound-measured abdominal circumference to screen for fetal growth abnormalities.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):820.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.042. Epub 2015 Mar 25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25818672 Free PMC article.
-
Hepato - Cephalic Index as a Predictor of Intrauterine Growth Restriction.Acta Inform Med. 2016 Feb;24(1):12-5. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.12-15. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Acta Inform Med. 2016. PMID: 27046941 Free PMC article.
-
Morphological and functional evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal growth by ultrasonography.J Med Ultrason (2001). 2009 Sep;36(3):105-17. doi: 10.1007/s10396-009-0224-4. Epub 2009 Aug 12. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2009. PMID: 27277223 Review.
-
Color doppler evaluation of cerebral-umbilical pulsatility ratio and its usefulness in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2010 Feb;20(1):20-5. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.59747. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2010. PMID: 20351987 Free PMC article.
-
Foetal growth parameters--clinical versus ultrasonographic.Indian J Pediatr. 1992 Jan-Feb;59(1):91-101. doi: 10.1007/BF02760907. Indian J Pediatr. 1992. PMID: 1612664
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical