Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 1;34(3):274-280.
doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002283.

Significance of validated symptom assessment versus breath testing for malabsorption after lactose load in children

Affiliations

Significance of validated symptom assessment versus breath testing for malabsorption after lactose load in children

Georg Sterniste et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Lactose malabsorption and lactose-induced symptoms are poorly correlated, as shown by breath tests and various symptom assessment methods. Validated assessment is the key to overcome the limitations of biased symptom measurements. We characterized lactose-induced symptoms with the population-specific, validated paediatric carbohydrate perception questionnaire (pCPQ) and their correlation with the history of symptoms (HoS).

Methods: A total of 130 patients with functional gastrointestinal symptoms underwent a lactose hydrogen breath and tolerance test (LBTT) allowing for a diagnosis of malabsorption (M+) and lactose sensitivity (S+). HoS indicative of lactose-induced symptoms (abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, flatulence, diarrhoea) in the 4 weeks preceding the test was determined using a validated questionnaire. The pCPQ was used to score lactose-induced symptoms.

Main results: The LBTT revealed 41 children (31.5%) with lactose malabsorption (M+), 56 (43.1%) with lactose sensitivity (S+) and 24 (18.5%) were M+/S+. Sensitivity correlated with HoS (P < 0.001), regardless of whether malabsorption was detectable. Malabsorption status did not correlate with HoS (NS). The odds of lactose sensitivity significantly increased when abdominal pain [odds ratio (OR) 3.5, confidence interval (CI) 1.6-7.8], nausea (OR 2.3, CI, 1.1-4.9) and flatulence (OR 3.1, CI 1.4-6.8) were reported in the 4 weeks preceding the LBTT. Symptoms after the lactose load were similar for M+/S+ and M-/S+, except for flatulence, which was more frequent in malabsorbers (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Our findings fit well with the emerging view of the important role of a validated symptom assessment after a lactose load. The determination of symptoms may be more relevant than malabsorption for the clinical outcomes of paediatric patients with lactose-related gastrointestinal symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Borgstrom B, Dahlqvist A, Lundh G, Sjovall J. Studies of intestinal digestion and absorption in the human. J Clin Invest 1957; 36:1521–1536.
    1. Misselwitz B, Butter M, Verbeke K, Fox MR. Update on lactose malabsorption and intolerance: pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management. Gut 2019; 68:2080–2091.
    1. Heyman MB; Committee on Nutrition. Lactose intolerance in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 2006; 118:1279–1286.
    1. Welsh JD, Poley JR, Bhatia M, Stevenson DE. Intestinal disaccharidase activities in relation to age, race, and mucosal damage. Gastroenterology 1978; 75:847–855.
    1. Yang Y, He M, Cui H, Bian L, Wang Z. The prevalence of lactase deficiency and lactose intolerance in Chinese children of different ages. Chin Med J (Engl) 2000; 113:1129–1132.