Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 31;23(1):102.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05067-5.

Does surgical technique influence the burden of lung metastases in patients with pathologic long bone fractures?

Affiliations

Does surgical technique influence the burden of lung metastases in patients with pathologic long bone fractures?

Joseph K Kendal et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: The aims of this study are to (1) determine whether fixation of metastatic long bone fractures with an intramedullary nail (IMN) influences the incidence of lung metastasis in comparison to arthroplasty or ORIF (Arthro/ORIF); and (2) assess this relationship in primary tumor types; and (3) to assess survival implications of lung metastasis after surgery.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study investigating 184 patients (107 IMN, and 77 Arthro/ORIF) surgically treated for metastatic long bone fractures. Patients were required to have a single surgically treated impending or established pathologic fracture of a long bone, pre-operative lung imaging (lung radiograph or computed tomography) and post-operative lung imaging within 6 months of surgery. Primary cancer types included were breast (n = 70), lung (n = 43), prostate (n = 34), renal cell (n = 37). Statistical analyses were conducted using two-tailed Fisher's exact tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

Results: Patients treated with IMN and Arthro/ORIF developed new or progressive lung metastases following surgery at an incidence of 34 and 26%, respectively. Surgical method did not significantly influence lung metastasis (p = 0.33). Furthermore, an analysis of primary cancer subgroups did not yield any differences between IMN vs Arthro/ORIF. Median survival for the entire cohort was 11 months and 1-year overall survival was 42.7% (95% CI: 35.4-49.8). Regardless of fixation method, the presence of new or progressive lung metastatic disease at follow up imaging study was found to have a negative impact on patient survival (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In this study, development or progression of metastatic lung disease was not affected by long bone stabilization strategy. IM manipulation of metastatic long bone fractures therefore may not result in a clinically relevant increase in metastatic lung burden. The results of this study also suggest that lung metastasis within 6 months of surgery for metastatic long bone lesions is negatively associated with patient survival.

Level of evidence: III, therapeutic study.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Intramedullary nail; Lung metastasis; Metastatic bone disease; Pathologic fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests for all authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The primary research objective was to assess whether surgical technique influenced subsequent incidence of new or progressive lung metastases
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Details regarding the patient selection process are represented as a flow diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary data of the incidence of new or progressive lung metastasis demonstrated no difference in the incidence of lung metastasis for all primaries combined, or for breast, lung, prostate or renal primaries analyzed individually
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Survival analyses assessed the influence of progressive lung disease and surgical technique on mortality. A Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed for patients who were identified to have no lung progression, versus those who had progression. B Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed for patients undergoing either IMN or Arthro/ORIF. IMN = Intramedullary nail, Arthro/ORIF = arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation cases combined. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals

Similar articles

References

    1. Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ, Cronin KA, Ma J, Ryerson B, Mariotto A, Lake AJ, Wilson R, Sherman RL, Anderson RN, Henley SJ, Kohler BA, Penberthy L, Feuer EJ, Weir HK. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2014, Featuring Survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(9):djx030. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Narazaki DK, de Alverga Neto CC, Baptista AM, Caiero MT, de Camargo OP. Prognostic factors in pathologic fractures secondary to metastatic tumors. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2006;61(4):313–320. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322006000400007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirkinis MN, Lyne CJ, Wilson MD, Choong PF. Metastatic bone disease: a review of survival, prognostic factors and outcomes following surgical treatment of the appendicular skeleton. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(12):1787–1797. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ratasvuori M, Wedin R, Keller J, Nottrott M, Zaikova O, Bergh P, Kalen A, Nilsson J, Jonsson H, Laitinen M. Insight opinion to surgically treated metastatic bone disease: Scandinavian sarcoma group skeletal metastasis registry report of 1195 operated skeletal metastasis. Surg Oncol. 2013;22(2):132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.02.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anract P, Biau D, Boudou-Rouquette P. Metastatic fractures of long limb bones. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(1S):S41–S51. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.001. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms