Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;31(5):e13557.
doi: 10.1111/jsr.13557. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Dream recall frequency is associated with attention rather than with working memory abilities

Salomé Blain  1   2 , Aurélien de la Chapelle  1   2 , Anne Caclin  1   2 , Aurélie Bidet-Caulet  1   2 , Perrine Ruby  1   2
Affiliations

Dream recall frequency is associated with attention rather than with working memory abilities

Salomé Blain et al. J Sleep Res. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Several factors influencing dream recall frequency (DRF) have been identified, but some remain poorly understood. One way to study DRF is to compare cognitive processes in low and high dream recallers (LR and HR). According to the arousal-retrieval model, long-term memory encoding of a dream requires wakefulness while its multisensory short-term memory is still alive. Previous studies showed contradictory results concerning short-term memory differences between LR and HR. It has also been found that extreme DRFs are associated with different electrophysiological traits related to attentional processes. However, to date, there is no evidence for attentional differences between LR and HR at the behavioural level. To further investigate attention and working memory in HR and LR, we used a newly-developed challenging paradigm called "MEMAT" (for MEMory and ATtention), which allows the study of selective attention and working memory interaction during memory encoding of non-verbal auditory stimuli. We manipulated the difficulties of the distractor to ignore and of the memory task. The performance of the two groups were not differentially impacted by working memory load. However, HR were slower and less accurate in the presence of a hard rather than easy to-ignore distractor, while LR were much less impacted by the distractor difficulty. Therefore, we show behavioural evidence towards less resistance to hard-to-ignore distractors in HR. Using a challenging task, we show for the first time, attentional differences between HR and LR at the behavioural level. The impact of auditory attention and working memory on dream recall is discussed.

Keywords: attentional filter; audition; dream recall; dreaming; memory encoding; non-verbal; short-term memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bastuji, H., Perchet, C., Legrain, V., Montes, C., & Garcia-Larrea, L. (2008). Laser evoked responses to painful stimulation persist during sleep and predict subsequent arousals. Pain, 137(3), 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.027
    1. Belicki, K., Hunt, H., & Kelly, P. (1978). The function of dream and dreamer variables in the question of dream recall. Sleep Research, 7, 167.
    1. Bidet-Caulet, A., Bottemanne, L., Fonteneau, C., Giard, M.-H., & Bertrand, O. (2015). Brain dynamics of distractibility: interaction between top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of auditory attention. Brain Topography, 28(3), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0354-x
    1. Bidet-Caulet, A., Mikyska, C., & Knight, R.T. (2010). Load effects in auditory selective attention: Evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms. NeuroImage, 50(1), 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.039
    1. Blagrove, M., & Akehurst, L. (2000). Personality and dream recall frequency: Further negative findings (pp. 139-148).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources