Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;22(3):333-354.
doi: 10.1007/s10754-021-09322-5. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

Provider responses to discontinuous tariffs: evidence from Dutch rehabilitation care

Affiliations

Provider responses to discontinuous tariffs: evidence from Dutch rehabilitation care

Katalin Gaspar et al. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Abrupt jumps in reimbursement tariffs have been shown to lead to unintended effects in physicians' behavior. A sudden change in tariffs at a pre-defined point in the treatment can incentivize health care providers to prolong treatment to reach the higher tariff, and then to discharge patients once the higher tariff is reached. The Dutch reimbursement schedule in hospital rehabilitation care follows a two-threshold stepwise-function based on treatment duration. We investigated the prevalence of strategic discharges around the first threshold and assessed whether their share varies by provider type. Our findings suggest moderate response to incentives by traditional care providers (general and academic hospitals, rehabilitation centers and multicategorical providers), and strong response by profit-oriented independent treatment centers. When examining the variation in response based on the financial position of the organization, we found a higher probability of manipulation among providers in financial distress. Our findings provide multiple insights and possible indicators to identify provider types that may be more prone to strategic behavior.

Keywords: Policy evaluation; Provider incentive; Provider payment; Regulated competition; The Netherlands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution by provider type by normalized index of treatment hours (centered at T1)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Weighted treatment times by subcategory
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Weighted treatment hours by provider type

References

    1. Coulam RF, Gaumer GL. Medicare’s prospective payment system: A critical appraisal. Health Care Financing Review. 1992;1991(Suppl):45–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Douven R, Remmerswaal M, Mosca I. Unintended effects of reimbursement schedules in mental health care. Journal of Health Economics. 2018;42:139–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.03.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Einav L, Finkelstein A, Mahoney N. Provider incentives and healthcare costs: Evidence from long-term care hospitals. Econometrica. 2018;86(6):2161–2219. doi: 10.3982/ecta15022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eliason PJ, Grieco PLE, McDevitt RC, Roberts JW. Strategic patient discharge: The case of long-term care hospitals. American Economic Review. 2018;108(11):3232–3265. doi: 10.1257/aer.20170092. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis RP, McGuire TG. Provider behavior under prospective reimbursement, cost sharing and supply. Journal of Health Economics. 1986;5(1):129–151. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90002-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources