Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;103(9):1807-1826.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.142. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Systematic Review of Functional Outcomes in Cancer Rehabilitation

Alix Sleight  1 , Lynn H Gerber  2 , Timothy F Marshall  3 , Alicia Livinski  4 , Catherine M Alfano  5 , Shana Harrington  6 , Ann Marie Flores  7 , Aneesha Virani  8 , Xiaorong Hu  9 , Sandra A Mitchell  10 , Mitra Varedi  11 , Melissa Eden  12 , Samah Hayek  13 , Beverly Reigle  14 , Anya Kerkman  15 , Raquel Neves  16 , Kathleen Jablonoski  17 , Eileen Danaher Hacker  18 , Virginia Sun  19 , Robin Newman  20 , Karen Kane McDonnell  21 , Allison L'Hotta  22 , Alana Schoenhals  23 , Nicole L Stout Dpt  24
Affiliations

Systematic Review of Functional Outcomes in Cancer Rehabilitation

Alix Sleight et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions targeting optimal physical or cognitive function in adults with a history of cancer and describe the breadth of evidence as well as strengths and limitations across a range of functional domains.

Data sources: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. The time scope was January 2008 to April 2019.

Study selection: Prospective, controlled trials including single- and multiarm cohorts investigating rehabilitative interventions for cancer survivors at any point in the continuum of care were included, if studies included a primary functional outcome measure. Secondary data analyses and pilot/feasibility studies were excluded. Full-text review identified 362 studies for inclusion.

Data extraction: Extraction was performed by coauthor teams and quality and bias assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence Scheme (class I-IV).

Data synthesis: Studies for which the functional primary endpoint achieved significance were categorized into 9 functional areas foundational to cancer rehabilitation: (1) quality of life (109 studies), (2) activities of daily living (61 studies), (3) fatigue (59 studies), (4) functional mobility (55 studies), (5) exercise behavior (37 studies), (6) cognition (20 studies), (7) communication (10 studies), (8) sexual function (6 studies), and (9) return to work (5 studies). Most studies were categorized as class III in quality/bias. Averaging results found within each of the functional domains, 71% of studies reported statistically significant results after cancer rehabilitation intervention(s) for at least 1 functional outcome.

Conclusions: These findings provide evidence supporting the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions for individuals with a cancer history. The findings should be balanced with the understanding that many studies had moderate risk of bias and/or limitations in study quality by AAN criteria. These results may provide a foundation for future work to establish clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitative interventions across cancer disease types.

Keywords: Functional status; Neoplasms; Rehabilitation; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest Statement:

Ann Marie Flores reports a consulting role with University of Pittsburg, LeaRRN. Lynn Gerber reports that she is on the scientific advisory board of the International Society of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, and she is on the board of the Foundation for Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. Timothy Marshall reports that he is a paid consultant for Select Medical and is employed by Ivy Rehab Network.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Significance and number of studies by functional domain
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cancer types studied by functional domain for studies with interventions achieving statistical significance
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Phases of treatment studied for studies with interventions achieving statistical significance
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Treatment settings for studies with interventions achieving statistical significance
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Benton MJ, Schlairet MC, Gibson DR. Change in Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Survivors After Resistance Training: Is There an Effect of Age? Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 2014;22(2):178–185. - PubMed
    1. Bozcuk H, Ozcan K, Erdogan C, Mutlu H, Demir M, Coskun S. A comparative study of art therapy in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and improvement in quality of life by watercolor painting. Complement Ther Med. 2017;30:67–72. - PubMed
    1. Chandwani KD, Perkins G, Nagendra HR, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of yoga in women with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(10):1058–1065. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark MM, Rummans TA, Atherton PJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of maintaining quality of life during radiotherapy for advanced cancer. Cancer. 2013;119(4):880–887. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demark-Wahnefried W, Colditz GA, Rock CL, et al. Quality of life outcomes from the Exercise and Nutrition Enhance Recovery and Good Health for You (ENERGY)-randomized weight loss trial among breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2015;154(2):329337. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types