Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):129.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09243-7.

Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab

Daniil L Stroyakovskiy et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: BCD-021 is a bevacizumab biosimilar which was shown to be equivalent to reference bevacizumab in a wide panel of physicochemical studies as well as preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo. International multicenter phase III clinical trial was conducted to compare efficacy and safety of BCD-021 and reference bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in a first-line treatment of inoperable or advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Patients with no previous treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC were randomly assigned 3:2 to BCD-021 or reference bevacizumab and were treated with bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin. Therapy continued for 6 cycles (every 3 weeks), until progression of the disease or unbearable toxicity. The primary study endpoint was the overall response rate. The study goal was to prove the equivalent efficacy of BCD-021 and reference bevacizumab. Equivalence margins for 95% CI for the difference in the overall response rates were set at [-18%; 18%], for 90% CI for the ratio of overall response rate were set at [67%; 150%].

Results: In total 357 patients were enrolled in the study, 212 in the BCD-021 group and 145 in the reference bevacizumab group. The ORR was 34.63% in the BCD-022 group and 33.82% in the reference bevacizumab group. Limits of 95% CI for the difference in overall response rates between the groups were [-9.47%; 11.09%]. Limits of 90% CI for the ratio of overall response rate between the groups were [79.6%; 131.73%]. For both approaches CI lied within predetermined equivalence margins. Profile of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the groups (any AEs were reported in 86.89% of patients in BCD-021 group and 89.05% of patients in reference group). No unexpected adverse reactions were reported throughout the study. No statistically significant differences regarding anti-drug antibody occurrence rate was found between BCD-022 (n=4; 1.96%) and comparator (n=5; 3.65%). Both drug products showed low occurrence rate and short life of anti-bevacizumab antibodies. Pharmacokinetics assessment after 1st and 6th study drug injection also demonstrated equivalent PK parameters by all outcome measures.

Conclusions: Thus, the results of this study demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of bevacizumab biosimilar BCD-021 and referent bevacizumab drug.

Trial registration: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Study Number NCT01763645, date of registration 09/01/2013).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
BCD-021-2 study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Disposition of subjects by study groups and reasons for withdrawal
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Efficacy endpoint assessment results (pooled mITT population). Note: ORR — overall response rate; CR — complete response; CPR — confirmed complete response; UPR — unconfirmed partial response; SD — stable disease; PR — progressive disease. Note: 1 — Fisher’s exact test; 2 — Pearson chi-square test

References

    1. Garcia J, et al. Bevacizumab (Avastin(R)) in cancer treatment: A review of 15 years of clinical experience and future outlook. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;86:102017. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Botrel TE, et al. Efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy (CT) compared to CT alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2011;74(1):89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orlov SV, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of BCD-021, bevacizumab biosimilar candidate, compared to Avastin in patients. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15_suppl):e13500. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.e13500. - DOI
    1. Díaz LP, et al. Current state and comparison of the clinical development of bevacizumab, rituximab and trastuzumab biosimilars. Future Oncol. 2021;17(19):2529–2544. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0923. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data