A systematic review of elbow arthroscopy complications : Complications, risk factors, and safety tips
- PMID: 35106672
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05320-5
A systematic review of elbow arthroscopy complications : Complications, risk factors, and safety tips
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the complications from elbow arthroscopy for the past 16 years, and to summarize the most reported safety techniques and risk factors.
Methods: Eligibility criteria included level I to IV evidence articles that were published after 2005 in the English language. Excluded were vet, paediatric, and cadaver studies. Open and arthroscopic-assisted elbow procedures were not included. Two online databases were comprehensively searched (PubMed and PMC) in April 2021. Relevant paper selection was conducted by two independent reviewers. MINORS score, demographic properties, indications, procedure type, complication rates, reoperation rates, reported risk factors, and safety techniques were recorded.
Results: Fifty-two articles met the criteria and were included. No relevant level I to II evidence studies were discovered. The mean age ranged from 31 to 65 years. The average body mass indexes were between 26 and over 40 kg/m2. There was a prevalence of male sex (from 50.2 to 79.2%). Most of the studies reported a minimum follow-up (range, 4 weeks-12 months). The most common arthroscopic procedure was debridement (up to 73% in Leong et al.'s study). The average MINORS score was 12 (range, 10-16). The total complications rate ranged from 1.5 to 11%, with a few studies reporting over 25%. Nerve injury rate was 1.26-7.5%. Re-operation rate ranged from none (100 procedures) to 11.8%.
Conclusions: Elbow arthroscopy is a successful procedure with a low overall complications rate (from 1.5 to 11%), and a low nerve injury rate (from 1.26 to 7.5%). Risk factors include patient-related factors (obesity, female sex, age over 65 years, elevated blood sugar levels, hypercoagulable disorder, tobacco and alcohol use), preoperative elbow impairment/previous surgery, and periprocedural steroid injections. Our review discovered a re-operation rate of 2 to 18%.
Keywords: Complications; Elbow arthroscopy; Risk factors; Safety tips.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
References
-
- Burman MS (1932) Arthroscopy of the elbow joint: a cadaver study. J Bone Jt Surg 14:349–350
-
- Andrews JR, Carson WG (1985) Arthroscopy of the elbow. Arthroscopy 1:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(85)80038-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Morrey BF (1986) Arthroscopy of the elbow. Instr Course Lect 35:102–107 - PubMed
-
- Poehling GG, Whipple TL, Sisco L, Goldman B (1989) Elbow arthroscopy: a new technique. Arthroscopy 5:222–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.06.025 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baumgarten TE, Andrews JR, Satterwhite YE (1998) The arthroscopic classification and treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum. Am J Sports Med 26:520–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465980260040801 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
