Dissemination of validated health literacy videos: A tailored approach
- PMID: 35107221
- PMCID: PMC8986138
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4572
Dissemination of validated health literacy videos: A tailored approach
Abstract
Background: Previously, we showed that chemotherapy terminology is difficult for patients to understand. Therefore, we developed short videos explaining key terminology and though proven effective, they will only be helpful if appropriately disseminated. Therefore, we aimed to determine the best dissemination method at three different healthcare settings.
Methods: With consent, we interviewed healthcare workers from (1) an academic cancer center, Winship Cancer Institute (Winship) serving higher SES patients, (2) an inner-city, safety-net hospital Grady Memorial (GMH), (3) clinics serving rural Georgia, from the Winship Community Network (Network). All interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a semantic content analysis method. Suggested dissemination plans were then implemented.
Results: Twenty-two Winship, 11 GMH, and 4 Network healthcare workers were interviewed. Seventy-two percent (n = 8) of the GMH and 100% (n = 4) of Network healthcare workers felt that the best place for patients to view the videos was in the clinic, compared to 27% (n = 6) of the Winship clinicians. 68% (n = 15) of the Winship clinicians stated an app would be the most useful format, compared to 27% (n = 3) at GMH, and 0% at Network sites. Video viewing increased after dissemination plans were implemented.
Conclusion: Educational materials explaining oncology treatment terminology enhance patient understanding, yet without proper dissemination, these tools may never reach the intended patient population. Our study shows that dissemination plans need to be tailored to each individual patient population, with rural and lower SES patients needing to view the videos during clinic visits, and patients of more means viewing them using technology at home.
Keywords: dissemination; educational tools; educational videos; health literacy; implementation science.
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interests.
Figures



References
-
- Chapman K, Abraham C, Jenkins V, Fallowfield L. Lay understanding of terms used in cancer consultations. Psychooncology. 2003;12(6):557‐566. - PubMed
-
- Pieterse AH, Jager NA, Smets EM, Henselmans I. Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology. Psychooncology. 2013;22(5):1186‐1191. - PubMed
-
- Zhang NJ, Terry A, McHorney CA. Impact of health literacy on medication adherence: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2014;48(6):741‐751. - PubMed
-
- Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97‐107. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical