Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Jun;75(3):227-235.
doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.04994-6. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

Semen cryopreservation in men undergoing cancer treatment: a ten-year study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Semen cryopreservation in men undergoing cancer treatment: a ten-year study

Beatrice Melli et al. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The advancement of Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the improvement in sperm freezing made male fertility preservation widely available. This study aims to evaluate the impact of cancer diseases on semen parameters before cryopreservation and the reproductive outcomes of patients who have thawed their semen samples.

Methods: An observational, cohort study was conducted on cancer patients submitted to fertility preservation in AUSL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia between 2007 and 2018. Semen samples were collected before cancer treatments, analyzed and frozen by rapid freezing. On request, these samples were thawed for Assisted Reproductive Technologies procedures. Semen parameters were compared between testicular versus other cancers.

Results: We included 329 patients with a successful cryopreservation in 94.5% of cases. Testicular cancer was associated with lower sperm volumes (P=0.041) and lower total sperm concentration (P=0.009) compared to other cancers. No difference was observed about sperm motility and morphology, while oligozoospermia was significantly more frequent in men with testicular cancer (P<0.001). In our cohort, the 8.4% of patients thawed their samples; the usage rate and the embryo transfer rate were significantly higher (P<0.05) among those with a testicular cancer, while pregnancy and livebirth rates did not differ.

Conclusions: Male fertility preservation is feasible, easy to be performed, non-invasive and does not delay cancer treatments. Men affected by testicular cancer had worse semen parameters at cryopreservation but pregnancy and livebirth rates were similar to those achieved by men with other cancers and similar to those achieved with fresh sperm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources