More Endoscopy-Based Brushing Passes Improve the Detection of Malignant Biliary Strictures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 35108222
- DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001666
More Endoscopy-Based Brushing Passes Improve the Detection of Malignant Biliary Strictures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic biliary brushing is the most common method used for sampling in patients with malignant biliary strictures (MBSs); however, its sensitivity is relatively low. There is still no consensus on endoscopy-based biliary brushing, although brushing 10 times in 1 specimen is routinely performed. This study was designed to compare the sensitivity of brush cytology for 10, 20, or 30 brushing times of a pass in 1 specimen in patients with MBSs.
Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study, patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected MBSs were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 10, 20, and 30 brushing times of a pass. The primary outcome was to compare the sensitivity of brush cytology among the 3 groups. Patients were prospectively followed up for 6 months after endoscopic brushing for malignancy diagnosis.
Results: A total of 443 patients were enrolled for intention-to-treat analysis (147, 148, and 148 patients in the 10-times, 20-times, and 30-time groups, respectively). The 3 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. The sensitivity of brush cytology was 38%, 47%, and 57% in the 10-times, 20-times, and 30-times groups, respectively, and the 30-times group showed significantly higher sensitivity than the 10-times group (P = 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that stricture length and the number of brushing passes were significant factors for the detection of biliary malignancy. No significant differences were observed in procedure-related complications among the 3 groups.
Discussion: Brushing 30 times could increase the diagnostic sensitivity without increasing complications and seems to be preferred for the endoscopic sampling and diagnosis of MBSs (chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR1800015978).
Copyright © 2022 by The American College of Gastroenterology.
Comment in
-
Increasing the Yield: When More Is Better.Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 May 1;117(5):729-730. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001724. Epub 2022 Mar 14. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35287142
-
Thirty Brushing Passes for Malignant Biliary Stricture: The Upper Limit or Do We Go Higher?Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;117(7):1172-1173. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001786. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35435863 No abstract available.
References
-
- Bowlus CL, Olson KA, Gershwin ME. Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;14:749.
-
- Korc P, Sherman S. ERCP tissue sampling. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;84:557–71.
-
- Jailwala J, Fogel EL, Sherman S, et al. Triple tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:383–90.
-
- Stewart CJR, Mills PR, Carter R, et al. Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: A review of 406 cases. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:449–55.
-
- Macken E, Drijkoningen M, Van Aken E, et al. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2000;63:254–9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical