Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Jan;112(1):135-56.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.1.135.

A two-locus neutrality test: applications to humans, E. coli and lodgepole pine

A two-locus neutrality test: applications to humans, E. coli and lodgepole pine

P W Hedrick et al. Genetics. 1986 Jan.

Abstract

The expected disequilibrium between two loci with k alleles at one locus and l alleles at the other is given for a sample of size n drawn from a population under neutrality equilibrium. Three different measures of disequilibrium with 95% intervals are tabulated for combinations of n, k, l and 4Nc, where N is the effective population size and c is the amount of recombination between the loci. The extent and pattern of disequilibrium are strongly dependent upon 4Nc and are somewhat dependent on n, k and l. The 95% intervals are large, particularly for low numbers of alleles and low values of 4Nc. As examples, observed disequilibrium from histocompatibility loci in humans (HLA) and electrophoretic data in E. coli and lodgepole pine were compared to these theoretical values. Using information about recombination rates, the HLA data showed more disequilibrium than neutrality expectations, whereas electrophoretic data from E. coli and lodgepole pine had somewhat less disequilibrium than neutrality expectations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Genetics. 1978 Jan;88(1):171-9 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1980 Oct 31;210(4469):545-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Sep;35(5):1055-7 - PubMed
    1. Prog Allergy. 1983;33:203-27 - PubMed
    1. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87-112 - PubMed

Publication types