Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):139.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8.

The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review

Claire Willmington #  1 , Paolo Belardi #  2 , Anna Maria Murante  1 , Milena Vainieri  1
Affiliations

The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review

Claire Willmington et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Benchmarking has been recognised as a valuable method to help identify strengths and weaknesses at all levels of the healthcare system. Despite a growing interest in the practice and study of benchmarking, its contribution to quality of care have not been well elucidated. As such, we conducted a systematic literature review with the aim of synthesizing the evidence regarding the relationship between benchmarking and quality improvement. We also sought to provide evidence on the associated strategies that can be used to further stimulate quality improvement.

Methods: We searched three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) for articles studying the impact of benchmarking on quality of care (processes and outcomes). Following assessment of the articles for inclusion, we conducted data analysis, quality assessment and critical synthesis according to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic literature review.

Results: A total of 17 articles were identified. All studies reported a positive association between the use of benchmarking and quality improvement in terms of processes (N = 10), outcomes (N = 13) or both (N = 7). In the majority of studies (N = 12), at least one intervention, complementary to benchmarking, was undertaken to stimulate quality improvement. The interventions ranged from meetings between participants to quality improvement plans and financial incentives. A combination of multiple interventions was present in over half of the studies (N = 10).

Conclusions: The results generated from this review suggest that the practice of benchmarking in healthcare is a growing field, and more research is needed to better understand its effects on quality improvement. Furthermore, our findings indicate that benchmarking may stimulate quality improvement, and that interventions, complementary to benchmarking, seem to reinforce this improvement. Although this study points towards the benefit of combining performance measurement with interventions in terms of quality, future research should further analyse the impact of these interventions individually.

Keywords: Benchmarking; Healthcare quality; Outcome indicators; Performance indicators; Process indicator; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the literature review process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scale of benchmarking initiatives (Panel A) and types of benchmarking developers (Panel B)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ettorchi - Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P. Benchmarking: A method for continuous quality improvement in health. Healthc Policy. 2012;7(4):101–119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Camp RC. The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. 1989. p. 320.
    1. Liebfried HJ, McNair CJ. In: Benchmarking: a tool for continuous improvement. Sons JW, editor. New York: John Wiley & sons; 1992.
    1. Watson GH. Strategic benchmarking: How to rate your comoany’s performance against the world’s best. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, editor. Somerset: Wiley; 1993.
    1. Bowerman M, Francis G, Ball A, Fry J. The evolution of benchmarking in UK local authorities. Benchmarking An Int J. 2002;9(5):429–449.

Publication types