Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep-Dec;16(3):144-151.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1533.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Using Double Plating with Biological and Artificial Bone Grafting of Aseptic Non-unions of the Distal Humerus: Clinical Results

Giuseppe Rollo  1 , Giovanni Vicenti  2 , Roberto Rotini  3 , Ante Prkic  4 , Denise Eygendaal  5 , Luigi Meccariello  1
Affiliations

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Using Double Plating with Biological and Artificial Bone Grafting of Aseptic Non-unions of the Distal Humerus: Clinical Results

Giuseppe Rollo et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2021 Sep-Dec.

Abstract

Aim: Intra-articular non-union of fractures is an uncommon but complex problem because in general, it is characterised by marked instability, pain, strength loss and significant functional limitation. The aim of this study is to report our prospective medium-term outcomes of the treatment of intra-articular, distal humeral aseptic non-unions using open reduction and internal fixation, augmented with artificial bone.

Materials and methods: A retrospective case series of 16 patients with intra-articular, aseptic non-unions of the distal humerus was analysed for range of motion, pain, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS) and Oxford Elbow Scores (OES) after 12 months. Mean age was 44 years (range, 18-84 years) and mean total follow-up was 43 months (range, 24-62 months).

Results: All subjective and objective scores were significantly higher 12 months after treatment with internal fixation and artificial bone augmentation; the mean improvement on the MEPS was 18 points and 17 points on the OES. All patients returned to work, most without limitations. Autografts had worse outcomes compared to allografts regarding post-operative pain and time to return to work. No adverse events related to the artificial bone augmentation were seen and all fractures consolidated.

Conclusion: The use of two locking plates and bone graft augmentation with autografts or allografts with artificial bone grafts is a successful treatment of intra-articular distal humeral non-unions after hardware failure or biological limitations.

Clinical significance: The use of artificial bone in the treatment of septic non-unions of the upper limb is safe. When no autograft is possible because of concurrent morbidity, it can be used alone or combined with an allograft to reconstruct the affected bone without leading to extra morbidity or complications.

How to cite this article: Rollo G, Vicenti G, Rotini R, et al. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Using Double Plating with Biological and Artificial Bone Grafting of Aseptic Non-unions of the Distal Humerus: Clinical Results. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(3):144-151.

Keywords: Artificial bone grafting; Aseptic non-union; Distal humerus; Patient-reported outcomes; Reconstruction; Revision surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Figs 1A to Q
Figs 1A to Q
(A and B): Initial situation at time of referral, 3 weeks after treatment elsewhere; (C and D): Situation after removal of K-wires at our outpatient clinic; (E and F): Three-dimensional views of the CT, made to assess comminution; (G and H): First post-operative radiographs; (I and J): One month after surgery, without loss of reduction; (K and L): Two months after surgery, with progression of bone union; (M and N): Three months after surgery; (O, P and Q): Six months after surgery, with completed one healing
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allende C, Allende BT. Post-traumatic distal humerus non-union: open reduction and internal fixation: long-term results. Int Orthop. 2009;33(5):1289–1294. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0650-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donders JCE, Lorich DG, Helfet DL, et al. Surgical technique: treatment of distal humerus nonunions. HSS J. 2017;13(3):282–291. doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9551-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helfet DL, Kloen P, Anand N, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of delayed unions and nonunions of fractures of the distal part of the humerus. J Bone Jt Surg – Ser A. 2003;85(1):33–40. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bégué T. Articular fractures of the distal humerus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1 Suppl.) doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rollo G, Rotini R, Eygendaal D, et al. Effect of trochleocapitellar index on adult patient-reported outcomes after noncomminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2018;27(7):1326–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.073. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources