Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep-Dec;16(3):152-160.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1541.

A Single Approach for Management of Fractures Involving Both Columns of the Acetabulum: A Case Series of 23 Patients

Affiliations

A Single Approach for Management of Fractures Involving Both Columns of the Acetabulum: A Case Series of 23 Patients

Atul Patil et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2021 Sep-Dec.

Abstract

Aim and objective: To study the radiological and functional outcomes as well as complications in the management of fractures involving both columns of the acetabulum using a single surgical approach.

Design: Type IV, prospective clinical study.

Setting: Level I trauma centre.

Materials and methods: Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patients over 20 year of age and (b) patients suffering from acetabular fractures involving both columns as per Letournel and Judet classification, namely transverse, transverse + posterior wall, T type, anterior column posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) and associated both columns. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patient suffering from isolated anterior column, posterior column, anterior wall, posterior wall and posterior wall + column fractures; (b) patient who have undergone surgical procedures of the hip prior to trauma; and (c) compound acetabular fractures. A total of 23 patients having both column acetabulum fractures were included prospectively from June 2016 to December 2018 and followed up till 1 year postoperatively. Open reduction and internal fixation were performed through one of three described approaches, i.e., iliofemoral, Kocher-Langenbeck, and anterior intrapelvic or ilioinguinal.

Results: Our study population consisted of 30.4% transverse, 39.1% associated both columns, 21.7% T type and 8.7% anterior column + posterior hemi-transverse. Of these, 65.2% were operated using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach, while 30.4% of patients required the anterior intrapelvic approach. The remaining 4.3% of patients were operated by the iliofemoral approach. Anatomic reduction was achieved in 100% of our study population with remaining displacement less than or equal to 1°mm. At 1-year follow-up, all fractures showed a satisfactory union with an excellent Matta index in 100% study subjects. Complications at 1 year included one case of foot drop, which was present preoperatively but failed to improve and one case of post-traumatic arthritis. Average Harris Hip score (HHS) and mean Merle D'Aubigne (MDA) scores suggested good clinical outcomes in the study population.

Conclusions: A single approach can be used to achieve good functional and radiological outcomes in carefully selected bicolumnar fractures of the acetabulum, with less approach-related morbidity.

Clinical significance: Traditionally, multiple approaches are used for acetabulum fractures involving both columns, but with proper patient selection, single approach can be used with good functional and surgical outcomes.

How to cite this article: Patil A, Attarde DS, Haphiz A, et al. A Single Approach for Management of Fractures Involving Both Columns of the Acetabulum: A Case Series of 23 Patients. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(3):152-160.

Keywords: Acetabular fracture; Bicolumnar fracture acetabulum; Single-approach acetabulum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Age distribution
Flowchart 1
Flowchart 1
Algorithm to determine approach based on column involved
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
VAS at 3, 6, and 12 months
Figs 3A and B
Figs 3A and B
Box and Whisker chart showing MCS and PCS components at the follow-up
Figs 4A to F
Figs 4A to F
Box and Whisker chart showing MCS and PCS scores among three different groups IL, Iliofemoral; KL, Kocher-Lagenbeck and Stoppas
Figs 5A to F
Figs 5A to F
Preoperative radiographs and CT scan showing bicolumnar fracture
Figs 6A to C
Figs 6A to C
Immediate post-operative radiographs showing good reduction through AIP approach
Figs 7A to C
Figs 7A to C
1-year follow-up radiographs showing good osseous union
Figs 8A to C
Figs 8A to C
Clinical outcome at 1 year
Figs 9A and B
Figs 9A and B
Preoperative radiograph and CT scan showing bicolumnar acetabulum fracture
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Post-operative radiograph showing both fractures managed with iliofemoral approach
Figs 11A to C
Figs 11A to C
Good radiological and functional outcomes at 1 year with single iliofemoral approach

References

    1. Peter RE. Open reduction and internal fixation of osteoporotic acetabular fractures through the ilio-inguinal approach: use of buttress plates to control medial displacement of the quadrilateral surface. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 1):S2–S7. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)70003-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khoury A, Weill Y, Mosheiff R. The Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012;24(4–5):439–448. doi: 10.1007/s00064-011-0093-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Letournel E. Diagnosis and treatment of nonunions and malunions of acetabular fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1990;21(4):769–788. 2216407 - PubMed
    1. Hesp WL, Goris RJ. Conservative treatment of fractures of the acetabulum. Results after longtime follow-up. Acta Chir Belg. 1988;88(1):27–32. 3376664 - PubMed
    1. Matta JM, Mehne DK, Roffi RA. Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(205):241–250. 3698383 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources