Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;16(1):14-22.
doi: 10.1177/20494637211004658. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

A qualitative study with orthopaedic surgeons on pain catastrophizing and surgical outcomes: shifting from a medical towards a biopsychosocial model of surgery

Lorelle Dismore  1 , Anna van Wersch  2 , Aradhyula N Murty  1 , Katherine Swainston  2
Affiliations

A qualitative study with orthopaedic surgeons on pain catastrophizing and surgical outcomes: shifting from a medical towards a biopsychosocial model of surgery

Lorelle Dismore et al. Br J Pain. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Pain catastrophizing (PC) moderates surgical outcomes and behavioural interventions are recommended to optimise post-operative results. Less is known about surgeons' experiences of providing care and their attitudes towards the use of interventions in practice.

Objective: It is therefore invaluable to understand surgeons' views on how best to support patients who may be at risk of suboptimal recovery. Eleven surgeons and three registrar orthopaedic practitioners took part in semi-structured interviews within a hospital setting. The surgical decision-making process, views of PC and the use of behavioural interventions in surgical practice were explored.

Results: Thematic analysis identified five themes: pain expressions and pain behaviours affect the surgeons' decision-making process, when pathologies and symptoms do not match, psychological factors pertaining to unsatisfactory outcomes, a service gap in surgical care and the acceptability of using a screening tool in surgical practice to identify patients at risk of suboptimal recovery.

Conclusion: Orthopaedic surgeons face challenges in identifying who is likely to reach optimal versus suboptimal outcome. Surgeons are becoming increasingly aware of patient psychological distress being detrimental to outcomes, and they support the use of behavioural interventions to optimise post-operative outcomes or stop unnecessary treatments. The surgeons accept the use of a screening tool in surgical practice with better access to support services with input from allied health professionals. A screening tool may provide great utility for identifying at risk patients, to allow for modification of surgical patients care plans.

Keywords: Qualitative; behavioural interventions; orthopaedic surgeons; pain catastrophizing; post-operative outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The author(s) declare that there is no conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Levett DZ, Grimmett C. Psychological factors, prehabilitation and surgical outcomes: evidence and future directions. Anaesthesia 2019; 74(Suppl. 1): 36–42. - PubMed
    1. Flanigan DC, Everhart JS, Glassman AH. Psychological factors affecting rehabilitation and outcomes following elective orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23(9): 563–570. - PubMed
    1. Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, et al.. Award paper: predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Related Res 2003; 416: 27–36. - PubMed
    1. Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Ring DC. The role of emotional health in functional outcomes after orthopaedic surgery: extending the biopsychosocial model to orthopaedics: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg 2013; 95: 21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dowsey MM, Choong PF. Predictors of pain and function following total joint replacement. Arthroplast Update 2013; 20: 67–98.