Computer vision syndrome in healthcare workers using video display terminals: an exploration of the risk factors
- PMID: 35112736
- DOI: 10.1111/jan.15140
Computer vision syndrome in healthcare workers using video display terminals: an exploration of the risk factors
Abstract
Aims: To estimate the prevalence of computer vision syndrome (CVS) in healthcare workers and its relationship to video display terminal (VDT) exposure, sociodemographic, optical correction and work characteristics, and to analyse whether there are differences among occupational groups.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Methods: A sample of 1179 physicians and surgeons, nurses, and nursing assistants from two hospitals in Spain between January 2017 and February 2018 were invited to participate in this study. Of these, 622 workers from both hospitals were finally included. CVS was measured using a questionnaire, the CVS-Q© . Logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with CVS. All the results were stratified by occupational group.
Results: The prevalence of CVS was 56.75% with nurses being the most affected occupational group (61.75%). It was associated significantly with female sex (aOR = 2.57; 95% CI 1.36-4.88) and morning shifts plus on-call (aOR = 2.33; 95% CI 1.11-4.88) in the physicians and surgeons group. Among the nurses, it was associated with female sex (aOR = 2.35; 95% CI 1.03-5.37), seniority between 10 and 20 years (aOR = 2.17; 95% CI 1.03-4.59), VDT exposure at work of 2-4 h/day (aOR = 6.14; 95% CI 1.08-35.02), VDT exposure at work >4 h/day (aOR = 7.14; 95% CI 1.29-39.62) and self-perception that using the software application was not easy (aOR = 2.49; 95% CI 1.23-5.01).
Conclusions: A high prevalence of CVS among healthcare workers was observed. The risk factors that increased the likelihood of suffering from this syndrome depended on the occupation.
Impact: The findings may be used as a reference for occupational health services to implement specific preventive measures to reduce CVS for each occupational group. Such measures should consider both individual factors and the working conditions.
Keywords: computer terminals; computer vision syndrome; health personnel; nurses; nursing assistants; occupational exposure; occupational health; physicians; surgeons; video display terminals.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Effect of contact lens use on Computer Vision Syndrome.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 Mar;36(2):112-9. doi: 10.1111/opo.12275. Epub 2016 Jan 6. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016. PMID: 26743161
-
Computer vision syndrome prevalence according to individual and video display terminal exposure characteristics in Spanish university students.Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;75(3):e13681. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13681. Epub 2020 Sep 29. Int J Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 32813924
-
Prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome and Its Relationship with Ergonomic and Individual Factors in Presbyopic VDT Workers Using Progressive Addition Lenses.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 5;17(3):1003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031003. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32033372 Free PMC article.
-
[Negative impact of video display terminals on the organs of vision].Gig Sanit. 2007 Mar-Apr;(2):30-3. Gig Sanit. 2007. PMID: 17526223 Review. Russian.
-
Computer vision syndrome: A review.Work. 2015;52(2):303-14. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152162. Work. 2015. PMID: 26519133 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of the Outcomes of the Screen-Time Reduction in Computer Vision Syndrome: A Cohort Comparative Study.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 7;17:123-134. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S399044. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36644605 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Optom. 2024 Jan-Mar;17(1):100482. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2023.100482. Epub 2023 Oct 30. J Optom. 2024. PMID: 37866176 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of The Digital Eye Strain Questionnaire.BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 May 30;25(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04149-x. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40448055 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and Determinants of Computer Vision Syndrome Among Healthcare Providers in Al Baha, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus. 2025 Jun 14;17(6):e85991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85991. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40666591 Free PMC article.
-
Computer vision syndrome-related symptoms in presbyopic computer workers.Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;43(9):3237-3245. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02724-z. Epub 2023 Apr 27. Int Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37103757 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aakre, B. M., & Doughty, M. J. (2007). Are there differences between “visual symptoms” and specific ocular symptoms associated with video display terminal (VDT) use? Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 30(3), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2007.01.001
-
- Agarwal, S., Goel, D., & Sharma, A. (2013). Evaluation of the factors which contribute to the ocular complaints in computer users. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7(2), 331-335. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/5150.2760
-
- Anshel, J. R. (2005). Visual ergonomics handbook (1st ed.) Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420032055
-
- AOA. (2020). Computer vision syndrome. American Optometric Association. https://www.aoa.org/patients-and-public/caring-for-your-vision/protectin...
-
- Artime Ríos, E. M., Sánchez Lasheras, F., Suárez Sánchez, A., Iglesias-Rodríguez, F. J., & Seguí Crespo, M. D. M. (2019). Prediction of computer vision syndrome in health personnel by means of genetic algorithms and binary regression trees. Sensors, 19(12), 2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19122800
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous