Obstetric anal sphincter injuries and other delivery trauma: a US national survey of obstetrician-gynecologists
- PMID: 35113178
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05062-9
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries and other delivery trauma: a US national survey of obstetrician-gynecologists
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Obstetric lacerations complicate the majority of deliveries. The application of standardized guidelines for assessing delivery trauma has not been assessed thoroughly in the United States. We recently identified gaps in US midwives' clinical assessment of delivery trauma. We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of practicing obstetricians in the USA to characterize their classification of obstetric lacerations. We hypothesized that attending obstetricians' identification and diagnosis of delivery trauma would be similar to our findings for midwives with frequent inaccuracy.
Methods: We recruited clinically active obstetricians through the Pregnancy-Related Care Research Network. We asked participants to classify (from written definitions) and diagnose (from standard illustrations) common forms of vaginal delivery trauma using the widely employed perineal laceration degree system. We performed bivariate analysis of high- and low-scoring respondents and logistic regression to model characteristics associated with higher diagnostic accuracy.
Results: Of the 162 respondents who started the survey, 76% (123) were included for analysis (22% of solicited emails). Overall, we found wide variation in response accuracy with as few as 62% of respondents correctly classifying certain types of lacerations. Only 49 out of 123 (40%) use the Sultan third-degree subclassification system and 67 out of 123 (52%) continue to use the midline/median approach for episiotomies. Providers reporting fewer deliveries per month and fewer publicly insured patients earned higher scores.
Conclusions: Obstetricians in a nationally representative US perinatal provider network inconsistently identify perineal and nonperineal lacerations. We found important clinical knowledge gaps, suggesting that vaginal delivery diagnoses in obstetric quality studies and pelvic floor research might be inaccurate.
Keywords: Laceration identification; Laceration repair; OASI; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Obstetric trauma; Perineal laceration.
© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association.
Similar articles
-
Identification of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) and other lacerations: a national survey of nurse-midwives.Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1745-1753. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04304-6. Epub 2020 May 12. Int Urogynecol J. 2021. PMID: 32399907
-
Family medicine physician identification of obstetric lacerations: a US national survey.Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Feb;35(2):391-399. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05689-w. Epub 2023 Dec 11. Int Urogynecol J. 2024. PMID: 38078914
-
Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):310.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.041. Epub 2016 Feb 20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26902989
-
[Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30385355 Review. French.
-
Repair of episiotomy and obstetrical perineal lacerations (first-fourth).Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S1005-S1013. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.005. Epub 2023 May 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 37427859 Review.
Cited by
-
Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in the presence of an intact perineum.BMJ Case Rep. 2023 Oct 17;16(10):e253922. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-253922. BMJ Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37848273 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis, management and training in perineal trauma: a UK national survey of obstetricians.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Dec;34(12):2873-2883. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05590-6. Epub 2023 Jul 27. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 37498432 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 198: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):e87–e102. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002841 . - DOI
-
- Sultan AH. Editorial: obstetrical perineal injury and anal incontinence. AVMA Med Legal J. 1999;5(6):193–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/135626229900500601 . - DOI
-
- Gommesen D, Nohr EA, Qvist N, Rasch V. Obstetric perineal ruptures—risk of anal incontinence among primiparous women 12 months postpartum: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(2):165.e1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.026 . - DOI
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 210: fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(4):e260–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003187 . - DOI
-
- D'Souza JC, Monga A, Tincello DG, et al. Maternal outcomes in subsequent delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): a multi-centre retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):627–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03983-0 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical