National survey on the current practice and attitudes toward the management of chronic subdural hematoma
- PMID: 35113493
- PMCID: PMC8933788
- DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2463
National survey on the current practice and attitudes toward the management of chronic subdural hematoma
Abstract
Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a frequent pathological entity in daily clinical practice. However, evidence-based CSDH-guidelines are lacking and level I evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is limited. In order to establish and subsequently implement a guideline, insight into current clinical practice and attitudes toward CSDH-treatment is required. The aim is to explore current practice and attitudes toward CSDH-management in the Netherlands.
Methods: A national online survey was distributed among Dutch neurologists and neurosurgeons, examining variation in current CSDH-management through questions on treatment options, (peri)operative management, willingness to adopt new treatments and by presenting four CSDH-cases.
Results: One hundred nineteen full responses were received (8% of neurologists, N = 66 and 35% of neurosurgeons, N = 53). A majority of the respondents had a positive experience with burr-hole craniostomy (93%) and with a conservative policy (56%). Around a third had a positive experience with the use of dexamethasone as primary (30%) and additional (33.6%) treatment. These numbers were also reflected in the treatment preferences in the presented cases. (Peri)operative management corresponded among responding neurosurgeons. Most respondents would be willing to implement dexamethasone (98%) if equally effective as surgery and tranexamic acid (93%) if effective in CSDH-management.
Conclusion: Variation was found regarding preferential CSDH-treatment. However, this is considered not to be insurmountable when implementing evidence-based treatments. This baseline inventory on current clinical practice and current attitudes toward CSDH-treatment is a stepping-stone in the eventual development and implementation of a national guideline.
Keywords: chronic subdural hematoma; guideline; surveys and questionnaires; traumatic brain injury; treatment.
© 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- af Wåhlberg, A. E. , & Poom, L. (2015). An empirical test of nonresponse bias in internet surveys. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 336–347. 10.1080/01973533.2015.1111212 - DOI
-
- Catapano, J. S. , Ducruet, A. F. , Nguyen, C. L. , Baranoski, J. F. , Cole, T. S. , Majmundar, N. , Wilkinson, D. A. , Fredrickson, V. L. , Cavalcanti, D. D. , & Albuquerque, F. C. (2021). Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: An institutional technical analysis. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 13(7), 657–660. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016552 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine. (2009). Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence. Retrieved from https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels‐of‐evidence/oxford‐centre‐for...
-
- Clinicaltrials.gov. (2018). Indentifier NCT03582293, Tranexamic Acid to Prevent OpeRation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma (TORCH). Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03582293
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
