Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 3;12(2):e053108.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053108.

Optimising Access Surgery in Senior Haemodialysis Patients (OASIS): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations

Optimising Access Surgery in Senior Haemodialysis Patients (OASIS): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Boudewijn Dc Heggen et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Current evidence on vascular access strategies for haemodialysis patients is based on observational studies that are at high risk of selection bias. For elderly patients, autologous arteriovenous fistulas that are typically created in usual care may not be the best option because a significant proportion of fistulas either fail to mature or remain unused. In addition, long-term complications associated with arteriovenous grafts and central venous catheters may be less relevant when considering the limited life expectancy of these patients. Therefore, we designed the Optimising Access Surgery in Senior Haemodialysis Patients (OASIS) trial to determine the best strategy for vascular access creation in elderly haemodialysis patients.

Methods and analysis: OASIS is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with an equal participant allocation in three treatment arms. Patients aged 70 years or older who are expected to initiate haemodialysis treatment in the next 6 months or who have started haemodialysis urgently with a catheter will be enrolled. To detect and exclude patients with an unusually long life expectancy, we will use a previously published mortality prediction model after external validation. Participants allocated to the usual care arm will be treated according to current guidelines on vascular access creation and will undergo fistula creation. Participants allocated to one of the two intervention arms will undergo graft placement or catheter insertion. The primary outcome is the number of access-related interventions required for each patient-year of haemodialysis treatment. We will enrol 195 patients to have sufficient statistical power to detect an absolute decrease of 0.80 interventions per year.

Ethics and dissemination: Because of clinical equipoise, we believe it is justified to randomly allocate elderly patients to the different vascular access strategies. The study was approved by an accredited medical ethics review committee. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and will be implemented in clinical practice guidelines.

Trial registration number: NL7933.

Protocol version and date: V.5, 25 February 2021.

Keywords: adult nephrology; dialysis; end-stage renal failure; vascular surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart. On referral for vascular access creation, patients are screened for eligibility. Patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and provide informed consent will be randomised and allocated to one of the treatment strategies. Follow-up for the primary and secondary outcomes starts at the moment of treatment allocation. PROM, patient-reported outcome measure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calibration plot presenting the mortality risk as predicted by the Dusseux risk score and the observed risk in the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis cohort, such that the 45° line indicates perfect agreement between predicted and observed risks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curve comparing the survival probability for the high risk and the low risk groupS in the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis cohort.

References

    1. Kramer A, Boenink R, Noordzij M, et al. . The ERA-EDTA registry annual report 2017: a summary. Clin Kidney J 2020;13:693–709. 10.1093/ckj/sfaa048 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bylsma LC, Gage SM, Reichert H, et al. . Arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;54:513–22. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almasri J, Alsawas M, Mainou M, et al. . Outcomes of vascular access for hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:236–43. 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.053 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poinen K, Quinn RR, Clarke A, et al. . Complications from tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a Canadian observational cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2019;73:467–75. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.10.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidli J, Widmer MK, Basile C, et al. . Editor's Choice - Vascular Access: 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018;55:757–818. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.001 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources