Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 14:12:789872.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.789872. eCollection 2021.

Data Sources for Drug Utilization Research in Brazil-DUR-BRA Study

Affiliations

Data Sources for Drug Utilization Research in Brazil-DUR-BRA Study

Lisiane Freitas Leal et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: In Brazil, studies that map electronic healthcare databases in order to assess their suitability for use in pharmacoepidemiologic research are lacking. We aimed to identify, catalogue, and characterize Brazilian data sources for Drug Utilization Research (DUR). Methods: The present study is part of the project entitled, "Publicly Available Data Sources for Drug Utilization Research in Latin American (LatAm) Countries." A network of Brazilian health experts was assembled to map secondary administrative data from healthcare organizations that might provide information related to medication use. A multi-phase approach including internet search of institutional government websites, traditional bibliographic databases, and experts' input was used for mapping the data sources. The reviewers searched, screened and selected the data sources independently; disagreements were resolved by consensus. Data sources were grouped into the following categories: 1) automated databases; 2) Electronic Medical Records (EMR); 3) national surveys or datasets; 4) adverse event reporting systems; and 5) others. Each data source was characterized by accessibility, geographic granularity, setting, type of data (aggregate or individual-level), and years of coverage. We also searched for publications related to each data source. Results: A total of 62 data sources were identified and screened; 38 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion and were fully characterized. We grouped 23 (60%) as automated databases, four (11%) as adverse event reporting systems, four (11%) as EMRs, three (8%) as national surveys or datasets, and four (11%) as other types. Eighteen (47%) were classified as publicly and conveniently accessible online; providing information at national level. Most of them offered more than 5 years of comprehensive data coverage, and presented data at both the individual and aggregated levels. No information about population coverage was found. Drug coding is not uniform; each data source has its own coding system, depending on the purpose of the data. At least one scientific publication was found for each publicly available data source. Conclusions: There are several types of data sources for DUR in Brazil, but a uniform system for drug classification and data quality evaluation does not exist. The extent of population covered by year is unknown. Our comprehensive and structured inventory reveals a need for full characterization of these data sources.

Keywords: Brazil; data sources; database management systems; databases (all types); drug utilisation research; health information systems; pharmaceutical preparations; pharmacoepidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Data sources for DUR in Brazil selection flowchart. * means third-nine data sources were selected. When characterized, two were related to the same drug-purchasing system and were grouped into one data source (SIASG and SISME).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Classification of data sources identified in Brazil.

References

    1. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (2019). Sistema Nacional de Gerenciamento de Produtos Controlados (SNGPC). Available at: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/produtos_controlados (Accessed June 24, 2019).
    1. Ali M. S., Ichihara M. Y., Lopes L. C., Barbosa G. C. G., Pita R., Carreiro R. P., et al. (2019). Administrative Data Linkage in Brazil: Potentials for Health Technology Assessment. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 984. 10.3389/fphar.2019.00984 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alves J. C., Osorio-de-Castro C. G. S., Wettermark B., Luz T. C. B. (2018). Immunosuppressants in Brazil: Underlying Drivers of Spending Trends, 2010-2015. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 18, 565–572. 10.1080/14737167.2018.1485098 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alves J. M., Albino D. B. L., Resener M. C., Zannin M., Savaris A., von Wangenheim C. G., et al. (2016). “Quality Evaluation of Poison Control Information Systems: A Case Study of the DATATOX System,” in 2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), Belfast and Dublin, Ireland, 20-24 June 2016 (IEEE; ), 30–35. 10.1109/CBMS.2016.53 - DOI
    1. Arrais P. S. D., Fernandes M. E., Pizzol T., Ramos L. R., Mengue S. S., Luiza V. L., et al. (2016). Prevalence of Self-Medication in Brazil and Associated Factors. Rev. Saude Publica 50, 13s. 10.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006117 - DOI - PMC - PubMed