Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;94(6):2837-2844.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27644. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

Third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: A systematic review of 30 published studies

Affiliations

Third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: A systematic review of 30 published studies

Fausto Petrelli et al. J Med Virol. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

We analyzed published studies on the efficacy and safety of the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in various general population settings. We conducted systematic searches of PubMed and EMBASE for series published in the English language through November 15, 2021, using the search terms "third" or "booster" or "three" and "dose" and "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2." All articles were selected according to the MOOSE guidelines. The seroconversion risk after third doses was descriptively expressed as a pooled rate ratio ([seroconversion rate after the third dose]/[seroconversion rate after the second dose]). The search returned 30 studies that included a total of 2 734 437 vaccinated subjects. In more than 2 700 000 Israeli patients extracted from the general population, the reduction in the risk of infection ranged from 88% to 92%. Conversion rates for IgG anti-spike ranged from 95% to 100%. In cancer or immunocompromised patients, mean IgG seroconversion was 39.4% before and 66.6% after third doses. A third dose seems necessary to protect against all COVID-19 infection, severe disease, and death risk.

Keywords: COVID-19; booster; third dose; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Bergman P, Blennow O, Hansson L. Safety and efficacy of the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS‐CoV‐2 in five groups of immunocompromised patients and healthy controls in a prospective open‐label clinical trial. EBioMedicine. 2021;74:103705. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yan Z, Yang M, Lai CL. Covid‐19 vaccinations: a comprehensive review of their safety and efficacy in special populations. Vaccines. 2021;9:1097. 10.3390/vaccines9101097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bar‐On YM, Goldberg Y, Mandel M, et al. Protection of BNT162b2 vaccine booster against Covid‐19 in Israel. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1393‐1400. 10.1056/nejmoa2114255 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohn BA, Cirillo PM, Murphy CC, Krigbaum NY, Wallace AW. SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine protection and deaths among US veterans during 2021. Science. 2021;375(6578):331‐336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cromer D, Steain M, Reynaldi A, et al. Articles neutralising antibody titres as predictors of protection against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants and the impact of boosting: a meta‐analysis. Lancet Microbe. 2021;5247(21):e52‐e61. 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00267-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types