Redo pelvic fracture urethral injury repair: The case for tadalafil
- PMID: 35118959
- PMCID: PMC9612764
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2021.21065
Redo pelvic fracture urethral injury repair: The case for tadalafil
Abstract
Objective: To define the role of tadalafil in improving outcomes of redo urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). PFUI is common in developing countries, invariably as a result of road traffic trauma. Repair is complex, and redo cases are even more challenging.
Material and methods: This was a longitudinal prospective nonrandomized study between 2017 and 2019. Men undergoing redo-urethroplasty were nonrandomized into two groups. Group 1 received tadalafil 5 mg the next day after surgery and continued for 3 months, and group 2 did not receive tadalafil. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing redo-urethroplasty willing to trial low-dose tadalafil post-operatively. Exclusion criteria were <18 years, females, primary cases, and complex cases such as recto-urethral fistula. Average follow-up was 19.5 months.
Results: Sixty patients were enrolled (29 in group 1 and 31 in group 2). Mean age was 31 years. These patients had 1-3 prior failed urethroplasties. Most required step 3 anastomotic urethroplasty (68.3%). Success was defined as absence of symptoms and no need for surgical intervention. Failure was defined as redo urethroplasty or >1 endoscopic intervention. Primary success was 83.3%. Success with tadalafil was 96.6%, compared to 71.0% in the non-Tadalafil group (P ¼ .0008). Only one patient on tadalafil failed, compared with nine in the non-tadalafil group. Secondary success rate was defined as the need for a single subsequent endoscopic intervention and was 93.3%.
Conclusion: In our series, there was improved outcome with using tadalafil in patients having redo urethroplasty for PFUI. Further trials should be done to evaluate the use in all PFUI cases.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
RE Re Do urethroplasty after multiple failed surgeries of pelvic fracture urethral injury.World J Urol. 2020 Dec;38(12):3019-3025. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02917-1. Epub 2019 Sep 4. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31485741
-
Management of complex and redo cases of pelvic fracture urethral injuries.Asian J Urol. 2018 Apr;5(2):107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 2. Asian J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29736373 Free PMC article.
-
Redo inferior pubectomy for failed anastomotic urethroplasty in pelvic fracture urethral injury.Curr Urol. 2024 Mar;18(1):30-33. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000224. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Curr Urol. 2024. PMID: 38505155 Free PMC article.
-
Optimising the outcome after anastomotic posterior urethroplasty.Arab J Urol. 2015 Mar;13(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Feb 25. Arab J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26019975 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The incidence of erectile dysfunction after pelvic fracture urethral injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Arab J Urol. 2015 Mar;13(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16. Arab J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26019983 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources