Does specificity of electrodiagnostic test referrals predict test outcome in children?
- PMID: 35119698
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.27515
Does specificity of electrodiagnostic test referrals predict test outcome in children?
Abstract
Introduction/aims: Electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) is important in evaluation of pediatric neuromuscular disease. Non-specific referrals have emerged as a leading reason for EDX in recent years. We examine whether referral-specificity is predictive of test outcomes in children.
Methods: EDX referrals and outcomes were audited over a 7-year period from 2013 to 2020 at CHI-Crumlin. Pre-test details were coded and compared to EDX outcomes using multinomial logistic regression.
Results: EDX studies were performed in 702 children (median age 10.2 years). In 36% of patients, EDX-referrals did not specify any pre-test diagnosis. Mononeuropathy (24%) and polyneuropathy (15%) were the leading pre-specified diagnoses as well as the most common test outcomes. Neurology and orthopedics/plastic surgery contributed the majority of referrals. Metabolic medicine and hematology/oncology were most likely to pre-specify a working diagnosis and were the specialties with both the highest proportion of abnormal outcomes and referral accuracy. EDX abnormality was present in 42% of patients and was predicted by specificity of referral and the absence of pain as a leading symptom. The accuracy of specified pre-test diagnoses was highest for suspected anterior horn cell disorders (67%). Accuracy of referrals, as well as abnormal test outcomes, were negatively predicted by the presence of pain as a leading symptom.
Discussion: EDX is informative in children but the likelihood of abnormal test-outcomes is diminished when a pre-specified working diagnosis is lacking or when the primary reason for referral is pain.
Keywords: EMG; accuracy; electrodiagnostics; pediatric; specificity.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
Pins and needles: The neurological examination and electrodiagnosis in children.Muscle Nerve. 2022 May;65(5):492-494. doi: 10.1002/mus.27528. Epub 2022 Mar 9. Muscle Nerve. 2022. PMID: 35211993 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kang PB, McMillan HJ, Kuntz NL, et al. Utility and practice of electrodiagnostic testing in the pediatric population: an AANEM consensus statement. Muscle Nerve. 2020;61(2):143-155.
-
- Hellmann M, von Kleist-Retzow JC, Haupt WF, Herkenrath P, Schauseil-Zipf U. Diagnostic value of electromyography in children and adolescents. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;22(1):43-48.
-
- Karakis I, Liew W, Darras BT, Jones HR, Kang PB. Referral and diagnostic trends in pediatric electromyography in the molecular era. Muscle Nerve. 2014;50(2):244-249.
-
- Darras BT, Jones HR. Diagnosis of pediatric neuromuscular disorders in the era of DNA analysis. Pediatr Neurol. 2000;23(4):289-300.
-
- Joyal KM, MacGregor JV, Hayawi LM, Webster RJ, McMillan HJ. Not so shocking: electromyography in pediatrics remains feasible and diagnostically useful. Can J Neurol Sci. 2021;1-7.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical