The Effect of Clusters of Double Triggering and Ineffective Efforts in Critically Ill Patients
- PMID: 35120043
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005471
The Effect of Clusters of Double Triggering and Ineffective Efforts in Critically Ill Patients
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize clusters of double triggering and ineffective inspiratory efforts throughout mechanical ventilation and investigate their associations with mortality and duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation.
Design: Registry-based, real-world study.
Background: Asynchronies during invasive mechanical ventilation can occur as isolated events or in clusters and might be related to clinical outcomes.
Subjects: Adults requiring mechanical ventilation greater than 24 hours for whom greater than or equal to 70% of ventilator waveforms were available.
Interventions: We identified clusters of double triggering and ineffective inspiratory efforts and determined their power and duration. We used Fine-Gray's competing risk model to analyze their effects on mortality and generalized linear models to analyze their effects on duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.
Measurements and main results: We analyzed 58,625,796 breaths from 180 patients. All patients had clusters (mean/d, 8.2 [5.4-10.6]; mean power, 54.5 [29.6-111.4]; mean duration, 20.3 min [12.2-34.9 min]). Clusters were less frequent during the first 48 hours (5.5 [2.5-10] vs 7.6 [4.4-9.9] in the remaining period [p = 0.027]). Total number of clusters/d was positively associated with the probability of being discharged alive considering the total period of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.001). Power and duration were similar in the two periods. Power was associated with the probability of being discharged dead (p = 0.03), longer mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), and longer ICU stay (p = 0.035); cluster duration was associated with longer ICU stay (p = 0.027).
Conclusions: Clusters of double triggering and ineffective inspiratory efforts are common. Although higher numbers of clusters might indicate better chances of survival, clusters with greater power and duration indicate a risk of worse clinical outcomes.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03451461.
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Magrans is supported by a Torres Quevedo contract (PTQ2018-010120) from the Agencia Española de Investigacion, Spain. Dr. Sarlabous is supported by Pla Estratègic de Recerca i Innovació en Salut program from the Health Department of Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain. Dr. Blanch is inventor of a U.S. patent owned by the Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí: “Method and system for managing related patient parameters provided by a monitoring device,” U.S. Patent No. 12/538,940. Drs. Montanyà and Blanch own stock options in BetterCare S.L., a research and development spinoff of Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí (Spain). The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- de Haro C, Ochagavia A, López-Aguilar J, et al.; Asynchronies in the Intensive Care Unit (ASYNICU) Group: Patient-ventilator asynchronies during mechanical ventilation: Current knowledge and research priorities. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019; 7:43
-
- Esperanza JA, Sarlabous L, de Haro C, et al.: Monitoring asynchrony during invasive mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2020; 65:847–869
-
- Vassilakopoulos T, Petrof BJ: Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004; 169:336–341
-
- Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, et al.: Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32:1515–1522
-
- Pohlman MC, McCallister KE, Schweickert WD, et al.: Excessive tidal volume from breath stacking during lung-protective ventilation for acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36:3019–3023