Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 4;18(2):e1009837.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009837. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Modelling brain representations of abstract concepts

Affiliations

Modelling brain representations of abstract concepts

Daniel Kaiser et al. PLoS Comput Biol. .

Abstract

conceptual representations are critical for human cognition. Despite their importance, key properties of these representations remain poorly understood. Here, we used computational models of distributional semantics to predict multivariate fMRI activity patterns during the activation and contextualization of abstract concepts. We devised a task in which participants had to embed abstract nouns into a story that they developed around a given background context. We found that representations in inferior parietal cortex were predicted by concept similarities emerging in models of distributional semantics. By constructing different model families, we reveal the models' learning trajectories and delineate how abstract and concrete training materials contribute to the formation of brain-like representations. These results inform theories about the format and emergence of abstract conceptual representations in the human brain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Representation of abstract concepts in parietal cortex.
A) Participants completed 10 runs of fMRI recordings. Before each run, they established a unique background context in their mind and were then asked to silently narrate a story of their own making that included the subsequent 61 abstract words, which were presented in a different random order in every run (all German word stimuli in Table A in S1 Text). B) In a searchlight analysis, representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) were extracted (i) from the brain data, by pairwise cross-validated correlations among localized activity patterns, and (ii) from a word2vec model of distributional semantics, by pairwise correlations among hidden-layer activations. C) Correlating the neural and model RDMs revealed clusters in bilateral inferior parietal cortex (IPC), primarily covering the angular gyrus. Brain maps are thresholded at pvoxel<0.001 (uncorrected) and pcluster<0.05 (FWE-corrected). Cross-sectional images of the significant clusters as well as unthresholded statistical maps can be found in the Supplementary Information (Figs G and H in S1 Text). D) These clusters persisted when repeating the analyses while partialing out the effects of emotional word content (using affect grids), visual wordform (using a visual-categorization DNN), and auditory properties of the spoken words (using a speech-recognition DNN). E) Within the IPC cluster defined on the full 45-million sentence model (marked by an arrow), we compared model families trained on different corpus sizes and on only abstract or concrete words, respectively. Brain-like representations emerged in models that were trained on as little as 100,000 sentences and on either abstract or concrete embeddings. Dots show individual-participant data, error bars denote SEM, asterisks represent p<0.05 (FDR-corrected).

References

    1. Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19: 2767–2797. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deniz F, Nunez-Elizalde AO, Huth AG, Gallant JL. The representation of semantic information across human cerebral cortex during listening versus reading is invariant to stimulus modality. J Neurosci. 2019;39: 7722–7736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huth AG, de Heer WA, Griffiths TL, Theunissen FE, Gallant JL. Human natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature. 2016;532: 453–458. doi: 10.1038/nature17637 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Just MA, Cherkassky VL, Aryal S, Mitchell TM. A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on the underlying brain codes. PLoS One 2010;5: e8622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008622 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell TM, Shinkareva SV, Carlson A, Chang KM, Malave VL, Mason RA, et al.. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science. 2008;320: 1191–1195. doi: 10.1126/science.1152876 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types