Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 5;6(1):13.
doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00418-1.

To share or not to share: communication of caregiver-reported outcomes when a patient has colorectal cancer

Affiliations

To share or not to share: communication of caregiver-reported outcomes when a patient has colorectal cancer

A Fuchsia Howard et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: The importance of patient-centered measurement in cancer care has led to recognition of the potential for caregiver-reported outcomes to improve caregiver, patient and healthcare system outcomes. Yet, there is limited evidence to inform caregiver-reported outcome implementation. Our purpose was to generate evidence to inform the meaningful and constructive integration of caregiver-reported outcomes into cancer care to benefit caregivers, including exploration of the question of the extent to which these assessments should be shared with patients. We focused on caregivers of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) because CRC is common, and associated caregiving can be complex.

Results: From our Interpretive Description analysis of qualitative interview data from 78 participants (25 caregivers, 37 patients, and 16 healthcare providers [HCPs]), we identified contrasting perspectives about the sharing of caregiver-reported outcome assessments with patients with CRC. Those who preferred open communication with both the patient and caregiver present considered this essential for supporting the caregiver. The participants who preferred private communication without the patient, cited concern about caregiver- and patient-burden and guilt. Recognizing these perspectives, HCPs described strategies used to navigate sensitivities inherent in preferences for open versus private communication.

Conclusions: The integration of caregiver-reported outcomes into cancer care will require careful consideration of caregiver and patient preferences regarding the communication of caregiver assessments to prevent additional burden.

Keywords: Caregiver; Caregiver-reported outcomes; Colorectal cancer; Family; Interpretive description; Measurement; Oncology; Psychosocial; Qualitative research; Supportive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest or competing interests.

References

    1. Borsky AE, Zuvekas SH, Kent EE, de Moor JS, Ngo-Metzger Q, Soni A. Understanding the characteristics of US cancer survivors with informal caregivers. Cancer. 2021;6:66. - PubMed
    1. Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Schafenacker AM, Weiss D. The impact of caregiving on the psychological well-being of family caregivers and cancer patients. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012;66:236–245. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2012.09.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zarit SH, Todd PA, Zarit JM. Subjective burden of husbands and wives as caregivers: a longitudinal study. Gerontologist. 1986;26(3):260–266. doi: 10.1093/geront/26.3.260. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hunt G, Longacre M, Kent E, Weber-Raley L. Cancer caregiving in the US: an intense, episodic, and challenging care experience. Natl Caregiv. 2016;6:66.
    1. Ochoa CY, Lunsford NB, Smith JL. Impact of informal cancer caregiving across the cancer experience: a systematic literature review of quality of life. Palliat Support Care. 2020;18(2):220–240. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000622. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources