Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;102(4):115637.
doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115637. Epub 2022 Jan 16.

SARS-CoV-2 screening in patients in need of urgent inpatient treatment in the Emergency Department (ED) by digitally integrated point-of-care PCR: a clinical cohort study

Affiliations

SARS-CoV-2 screening in patients in need of urgent inpatient treatment in the Emergency Department (ED) by digitally integrated point-of-care PCR: a clinical cohort study

Martin Möckel et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Patients in need of urgent inpatient treatment were recruited prospectively. A rapid point of care polymerase chain reaction test (POC-PCR; Liat®) for SARS-CoV2 was conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) and a second PCR-test from the same swab was ordered in the central laboratory (PCR). POC-PCR analyzers were digitally integrated in the laboratory information system. Overall, 160 ED patients were included. A valid POC-PCR-test result was available in 96.3% (n = 154) of patients. N = 16 patients tested positive for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus 2 (10.0%). The POC PCR test results were available within 102 minutes (median, interquartile range: 56-211), which was significantly earlier compared to the central laboratory PCR (811 minutes; interquartile range: 533-1289, P < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of the POC-PCR test was 100%. The implementation and digital laboratory information system integration was successfully done. Staff satisfaction with the POC process was high. The POC-PCR testing in the ED is feasible and shows a very high diagnostic performance. Trial registration: DRKS00019207.

Keywords: Critical interventions; Digital integration; Emergency Department; POC PCR; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare funding from Roche Molecular Systems for the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Process of the digitally integrated SARS-CoV-2 POC. ED = Emergency Department; POC = point-of-care.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Patient flow diagram. For this implementation and feasibility study, n = 200 tests were available. CL = central laboratory; ED = Emergency Department; PCR = polymerase chain reaction; POC = point-of-care.

References

    1. Daum LT, Fischer GW. Rapid and safe detection of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus RNA using onsite qPCR diagnostic testing from clinical specimens collected in molecular transport medium. J Appl Lab Med. 2021;6:1409–1416. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esbin MN, Whitney ON, Chong S, Maurer A, Darzacq X, Tjian R. Overcoming the bottleneck to widespread testing: a rapid review of nucleic acid testing approaches for COVID-19 detection. RNA. 2020;26(7):771–783. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansen G, Marino J, Wang ZX, Beavis KG, Rodrigo J, Labog K, et al. Clinical performance of the point-of-care cobas liat for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 20 minutes: a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(2):e02811–e02820. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonald S, Courtney DM, Clark AE, Muthukumar A, Lee F, Balani J, et al. Diagnostic performance of a rapid point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 in an urban emergency department setting. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(8):764–766. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mina MJ, Parker R, Larremore DB. Rethinking Covid-19 test sensitivity — A strategy for containment. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(22):e120. - PubMed