Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 5;22(1):238.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12610-5.

An innovative approach in monitoring oral cholera vaccination campaign: integration of a between-round survey

Affiliations

An innovative approach in monitoring oral cholera vaccination campaign: integration of a between-round survey

Jerôme Ateudjieu et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is essential in ensuring population's access to immunization. Surveys are part of this M&E approach but its timing limits the use of its results to improve the coverage of the evaluated campaign. An oral cholera vaccination campaign was organized in a health district of the Far North region of Cameroon and involved an innovative M&E approach. The aim of this project was to assess the feasibility and effect of using recommendations of a community-based immunization and communication coverage survey conducted after the first round of an OCV campaign on the coverage of the second-round of the campaign.

Methods: Two community-based surveys were included in the M&E plan and conducted at the end of each of the campaign rounds. Data were collected by trained and closely supervised surveyors and reported using smartphones. Key results of the first-round survey were disseminated to campaign implementing team prior to the second round. The two rounds of the pre-emptive campaign were organized by the Cameroon Ministry of Public Health and partners with a two-week interval in the Mogode Health District of the Far North region of Cameroon in May and June 2017.

Results: Of 120 targeted clusters, 119 (99.1%) and 117 (97.5%) were reached for the first and second rounds respectively. Among the Mogode population eligible for vaccination, the immunization coverage based on evidence (card or finger mark) were estimated at 81.0% in the first round and increased to 88.8% in the second round (X2=69.0 and p <0.00). For the second round, we estimated 80.1% and 4.3% of persons who were administered 2 doses and 1 dose of OCV with evidence respectively, and 3.8% of persons who have not been vaccinated. The distribution of campaign communication coverage per health area was shared with the campaign coordination team for better planning of the second round campaign activities.

Conclusions: It is feasible to plan and implement coverage survey after first round OCV campaign and use its results for the better planning of the second round. For the present study, this is associated to the improvement of OCV coverage in the second-round vaccination. If this is persistent in other contexts, it may apply to improve coverage of any health campaign that is organized in more than one round.

Keywords: Cameroon-Vaccination coverage -immunization; Campaign - Mogode - Far North; Cholera; Monitoring and evaluation; OCV; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mogode OCV: Map of Cameroon in Africa showing study sites in Mogode Health District in the Far North region (The map was produced using the software Qgis 2.18; the figure is owned by authors)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Timeline of the implementation of activities, result dissemination and surveys conducted after first and second rounds OCV campaigns

References

    1. Ali M, Nelson AR, Lopez AL, Sack DA. Updated Global Burden of Cholera in Endemic Countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2015 Jun 4 [cited 2021 Jun 7];9(6). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4455997/. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ngwa MC, Liang S, Kracalik IT, Morris L, Blackburn JK, Mbam LM, et al. Cholera in Cameroon, 2000-2012: Spatial and Temporal Analysis at the Operational (Health District) and Sub Climate Levels. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2016 Nov [cited 2021 Jun 7];10(11). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5113893/. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global Task Force on Cholera Control. CHOLERA COUNTRY PROFILE: CAMEROON. 2012 [cited 2021 Jun 7]; Available from: https://www.who.int/cholera/countries/CameroonCountryProfile2011.pdf?ua=1.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Task Force on Cholera Control. Prevention and control of cholera outbreaks: WHO policy and recommendations [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2021 Jun 7]; Available from: https://www.who.int/cholera/prevention_control/recommendations/en/index5....
    1. Organization WH. Oral cholera vaccines in mass immunization campaigns: guidance for planning and use [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2010 [cited 2021 Jun 15]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44448.

Publication types

Substances