Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 26;14(1):1-12.
doi: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i1.1.

Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations

Affiliations
Review

Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations

Alejandro Gutierrez-Barrios et al. World J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Use of ionizing radiation during cardiac catheterization interventions adversely impacts both the patients and medical staff. In recent years, radiation dose in cardiac catheterization interventions has become a topic of increasing interest in interventional cardiology and there is a strong interest in reducing radiation exposure during the procedures. This review presents the current status of radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and summarizes a practical approach for radiation dose management for minimizing radiation exposure. This review also presents recent innovations that have clinical potential for reducing radiation during cardiac interventions.

Keywords: Cardiac catheterization; Cathlab; Ionizing radiation; Quality improvement; Radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All of the authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radiation protection in the catheterization lab should be based on four principles. Time: radiation dose depends linearly on the exposure time. Distance: The amount of radiation exposure depends on the distance from the source proportionally to the inverse of the distance squared from the X-ray source, so staff can lower their exposure levels by a factor of four by doubling their distance from the source. Shielding: barriers of lead protection can be accomplished with different forms such as personal protective equipment or mobile shields. The greater the shielding around the source, the smaller the exposure. Education: training and education in radiation protection is one of the basic components of radiation protection programs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Two-dimensional radiation map for fluoroscopy (A) and acquisition imaging (B). The red zone denotes projections where < 26% of the image procurement occurred in the lowest tertile of Air Kerma rate. The yellow zone denotes projection where 26% to 40% of the images were procured in the lowest tertile of air kerma rate the value in each cell represents the median Air Kerma rate for the respective projection. Reproduced with permission from reference 8[3]. LAO: Left anterior oblique view; RAO: Right anterior oblique view.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Real time electronic personal dosimeters placed over the apron (A) and on the left wrist of the operator (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Zero Gravity® and Cathpax® AIR. A: Two hinged swing arm zero gravity systems installed in a hybrid room. This system consists of a single fixation point of the hinged swing arm. It can be used on both sides of the table if there is a fixation point available; B: A floor zero gravity unit. The suspended body and face shield can be repositioned for a broad range of procedures and room configurations; C, D: Photographs of the radiation protection cabin (Cathpax® AIR) in use during a coronary chronic total occlusion intervention.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correct positioning of the RadPad radioprotective drapes. A-B: The radioprotective drapes should be placed on the patient, between the image intensifier and the operator during (A) femoral and (B) radial procedures.
Figure 6
Figure 6
During robotic-assisted intervention, the interventional cardiologist sits in a radiation-shielded workstation and uses a set of joysticks and touchscreen controls that translate the physician’s movements into device control. A: Control console; B: Extended-reach arm; C: CorPath cassette of the robotic system.

References

    1. Elmaraezy A, Ebraheem Morra M, Tarek Mohammed A, Al-Habaa A, Elgebaly A, Abdelmotaleb Ghazy A, Khalil AM, Tien Huy N, Hirayama K. Risk of cataract among interventional cardiologists and catheterization lab staff: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Wassef AW, Hiebert B, Ravandi A, Ducas J, Minhas K, Vo M, Kass M, Parmar G, Hussain F. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:550–557. - PubMed
    1. Agarwal S, Parashar A, Bajaj NS, Khan I, Ahmad I, Heupler FA Jr, Bunte M, Modi DK, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:558–566. - PubMed
    1. Fetterly KA, Magnuson DJ, Tannahill GM, Hindal MD, Mathew V. Effective use of radiation shields to minimize operator dose during invasive cardiology procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1133–1139. - PubMed
    1. Marshall NW, Faulkner K, Clarke P. An investigation into the effect of protective devices on the dose to radiosensitive organs in the head and neck. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:799–802. - PubMed