Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 27:25:101684.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women's perceptions of cervical cancer screening

B O'Donovan  1   2   3 , Therese Mooney  4 , Ben Rimmer  5 , Patricia Fitzpatrick  4   6 , Grainne Flannelly  7 , Lorraine Doherty  4 , Noirin Russell  4 , Cara M Martin  1   2   3 , John J O'Leary  1   2   3 , Linda Sharp  5 , Mairead O'Connor  8
Affiliations

Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women's perceptions of cervical cancer screening

B O'Donovan et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland's national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed cancer had not been told of earlier misdiagnosed smear tests. During this high profile controversy we conducted qualitative interviews exploring factors that influence cervical screening participation. Women who had been invited for routine screening tests were recruited from the national screening register. Telephone interviews were conducted with 48 women aged 25-65 years; with a range of screening histories - 34 were adequately screened (attended all routine screening tests) and 14 were inadequately screened (attended some/no screening tests). Thematic analysis was conducted and all interviewees spontaneously raised the screening controversy revealing that the crisis had resulted in serious loss of trust, faith and confidence in the screening programme. Publicity surrounding the controversy had some beneficial effects, including increased awareness of the value of screening and beliefs that intense focus on the programme will improve the service long-term. Strategies which incorporate these findings could help rebuild trust in screening.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Perceptions; Qualitative; Screening; Trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

    1. Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2012. Thematic analysis. In: H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, K.J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, pp. 57–71. American Psychological Association. doi.org/10.1037/13620-004.
    1. Clarke N., Gallagher P., Kearney P.M., McNamara D., Sharp L. Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study. Psychooncology. 2016;25(12):1456–1462. doi: 10.1002/pon.4085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Alton P., Craddock F., Bergin N., Lynch J. Exploring the lived experience of partners of women impacted by cervical cancer and the CervicalCheck screening failure in Ireland. Psycho-oncology. 2021;30(11):1986–1989. doi: 10.1002/pon.5742. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Government of Ireland, 2018. Dr Gabriel Scally’s Scoping Inquiry into CervicalCheck. 11 Sept. Available at: https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/aa6159-dr-gabriel-scallys-scoping-inqu... [Accessed ******].
    1. Houston D.M., Lloyd K., Drysdale S., Farmer M. The benefits of uncertainty: Changes in women's perceptions of the cervical screening programme as a consequence of screening errors by Kent and Canterbury NHS Trust. Psychol. Health Med. 2001;6(2):107–113. doi: 10.1080/1354850012377. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources