Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 19:9:780389.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.780389. eCollection 2021.

Using Machine Learning to Predict Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Using Machine Learning to Predict Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

Ayleen Bertini et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence is widely used in medical field, and machine learning has been increasingly used in health care, prediction, and diagnosis and as a method of determining priority. Machine learning methods have been features of several tools in the fields of obstetrics and childcare. This present review aims to summarize the machine learning techniques to predict perinatal complications. Objective: To identify the applicability and performance of machine learning methods used to identify pregnancy complications. Methods: A total of 98 articles were obtained with the keywords "machine learning," "deep learning," "artificial intelligence," and accordingly as they related to perinatal complications ("complications in pregnancy," "pregnancy complications") from three scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. These were managed on the Mendeley platform and classified using the PRISMA method. Results: A total of 31 articles were selected after elimination according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The features used to predict perinatal complications were primarily electronic medical records (48%), medical images (29%), and biological markers (19%), while 4% were based on other types of features, such as sensors and fetal heart rate. The main perinatal complications considered in the application of machine learning thus far are pre-eclampsia and prematurity. In the 31 studies, a total of sixteen complications were predicted. The main precision metric used is the AUC. The machine learning methods with the best results were the prediction of prematurity from medical images using the support vector machine technique, with an accuracy of 95.7%, and the prediction of neonatal mortality with the XGBoost technique, with 99.7% accuracy. Conclusion: It is important to continue promoting this area of research and promote solutions with multicenter clinical applicability through machine learning to reduce perinatal complications. This systematic review contributes significantly to the specialized literature on artificial intelligence and women's health.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; machine learning; perinatal complications; prediction model; predictive tool; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Process for selecting articles for the systematic review (PRISMA). One hundred four articles were found. Sixteen articles were excluded by title, 18 were excluded by criteria, and 19 were excluded after reading. Finally, 31 articles for the review were selected.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Number of studies according to the complication to be predicted. Sixteen complications were identified: Prematurity, pre-eclampsia, adverse delivery, size for gestational age, gestational diabetes mellitus, neonatal mortality, fetal acidemia, fetal hypoxia, placental accreta, pulmonary diseases, cesarean section, placental invasion, congenital anomaly, spontaneous abortion and trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) failure, and severe maternal morbidity.

References

    1. ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) (2020). Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet. Gynecol. 135, e237–e260. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmed Z., Mohamed K., Zeeshan S., Dong X. (2020). Artificial Intelligence with Multi-Functional Machine Learning Platform Development for Better Healthcare and Precision Medicine. Database (Oxford) 2020, baaa010. 10.1093/database/baaa010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkhaleefah M., Wu C.-C. (2018). “A Hybrid CNN and RBF-Based SVM Approach for Breast Cancer Classification in Mammograms,”in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Miyazaki, Japan, 7-10 Oct. 2018, 894–899. 10.1109/SMC.2018.00159 - DOI
    1. Artzi N. S., Shilo S., Hadar E., Rossman H., Barbash-Hazan S., Ben-Haroush A., et al. (2020). Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Based on Nationwide Electronic Health Records. Nat. Med. 26, 71–76. 10.1038/s41591-019-0724-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barak-Corren Y., Castro V. M., Javitt S., Hoffnagle A. G., Dai Y., Perlis R. H., et al. (2017). Predicting Suicidal Behavior from Longitudinal Electronic Health Records. Ajp 174, 154–162. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010077 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources