Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;28(3):421-435.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13660. Epub 2022 Feb 6.

A codesigned fit-for-purpose implementation framework for aged care

Claudia Meyer  1   2   3 , Rajna Ogrin  1   4 , Xanthe Golenko  1   5 , Elizabeth Cyarto  1   6   7 , Kath Paine  1 , Willeke Walsh  1 , Alison Hutchinson  2   8 , Judy Lowthian  1   6   9
Affiliations

A codesigned fit-for-purpose implementation framework for aged care

Claudia Meyer et al. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives: The field of implementation science is critical for embedding research evidence into healthcare practice, benefiting individuals, organizations, governments, and the broader community. Implementation science is messy and complex, underpinned by many theories and frameworks. Efficacious interventions for older people with multiple comorbidities exist, yet many lack effectiveness evaluation relevant to pragmatic implementation within aged care practice. This article outlines the conceptualization and development of an Implementation Framework for Aged Care (IFAC), fit-for-purpose for an aged care organization, Bolton Clarke, intent on embedding evidence into practice.

Method: A four-stage process was adopted to (1) explore context and relevant literature to conceptualize the IFAC; (2) identify key elements for a draft IFAC; (3) expand elements and refine the draft in consultation with experts and (4) apply the IFAC to three existing projects, identifying key learnings. A checklist to operationalize the IFAC was then developed.

Results: The IFAC is grounded in codesign principles and encapsulated by the implementation context, from a social, cultural and political perspective. The IFAC addresses the questions of (1) why do we need to change?; (2) what do we know?; (3) who will benefit?; (4) who will make the change?; (5) what strategies will be used?; and (6) what difference are we making? Three pilot projects: early adoption of a Wellness and Reablement approach; a care worker and virtual physiotherapist-led program to prevent falls; and a therapeutic horticulture program for residential communities, highlight learnings of applying the IFAC in practice.

Conclusion: This fit-for-purpose IFAC was developed for a proactive and responsive aged care provider. The simplicity of the six-question IFAC is underpinned by substantial theoretical perspectives for its elements and their connections. This complexity is then consolidated into an 18-question checklist to operationalize the IFAC, necessary to advance the translation of evidence into clinical practice.

Keywords: health services research; healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adapted codesign framework
Figure 2
Figure 2
Implementation Framework for Aged Care (IFAC)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intersection of several theories to inform the ‘how'
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Glasgow R, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury M, Kaplan R, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health Approaches to Dissemination and Implementation Science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274‐1281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green L. From research to “best practices” in other settings and populations. Am J Health Behav. 2001;2(3):165‐178. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell S, Mor V, Harrison J, McCarthy E. Embedded pragmatic trials in dementia care: realizing the vision of the NIA IMPACT collaboratory. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(S1‐S7):1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale‐up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):e367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordstrum L, LeMahieu P, Berrena E. Implementation science: understanding and finding solutions to variation in program implementation. Quality Assurance in Education. 2017;25(1):58‐73.