Outcomes and lessons learnt from practice of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric setting of various age groups: a global study across 8 centres
- PMID: 35129624
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03950-3
Outcomes and lessons learnt from practice of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric setting of various age groups: a global study across 8 centres
Abstract
Purpose: To analyse and report the practice, outcomes and lessons learnt from a global series of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric multicentre series.
Methods: A retrospective review of anonymized pooled data gathered globally from 8 centres in paediatric patients (≤ 18 years of age) who had renal stones and underwent RIRS from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, stone characteristics, complications and stone-free rate (SFR; defined as endoscopically stone free and/or residual fragments < 2 mm on follow up imaging) were analysed. The cohort was stratified into 3 groups by age: < 5 years (Group A), 5-10 years (Group B) and > 10 years (Group C). Overall, post-operative complication rate was 13.7%. Chi-square comparisons were used for categorical variables; analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for continuous variables.
Results: 314 patients were analysed. The mean age was 9.54 ± 4.76 years. Groups A, B and C had 67 (21.3%), 83 (26.4%) and 164 (52.2%) patients, respectively. Mean stone size was 10.7 ± 4.62 mm. Pre-stenting was performed in 155 (49.4%) of patients, ureteral access sheaths (UAS) was used in 54.5% of patients with majority (71%) utilizing holmium laser for stone fragmentation. All complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2). SFR was 75.5%.
Conclusions: RIRS is acceptable as a first-line intervention in the paediatric population with reasonable efficacy and low morbidity. Complications are slightly higher in patients < 5 years of age, which should be taken into account while counselling patients.
Keywords: Paediatric; Renal calculi; Renal stone; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Ureteroscopy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Outcomes and lessons learnt from practice of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric setting of various age groups: a global study across 8 centres.World J Urol. 2022 Jun;40(6):1595-1596. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03981-w. Epub 2022 Mar 6. World J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35249121 No abstract available.
References
-
- He Q, Xiao K, Chen Y, Liao B, Li H, Wang K (2019) Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review. BMC Urol 19(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0520-2 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- “EAU Guidelines. Edn. Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2021. ISBN 978-94-92671-13-4.”.
-
- Kim SS, Kolon TF, Canter D, White M, Casale P (2008) Pediatric flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: the children’s hospital of Philadelphia experience. J Urol 180(6):2616–2619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.051 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Corcoran AT et al (2008) When is prior ureteral stent placement necessary to access the upper urinary tract in prepubertal children? J Urol 180(4 Suppl):1861–1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.106 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dave S, Khoury AE, Braga L, Farhat WA (2008) Single-institutional study on role of ureteroscopy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treatment of pediatric renal calculi. Urology 72(5):1018–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.065 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
